Quantitative attribution of 2016 extreme arctic warmth: comparison between late winter and early spring

Abstract A deep, large-scale warmth occurred in the Arctic from January to April 2016, but the roles of various physical processes in this period have not been quantified. Here, we utilize an updated version of the coupled atmosphere‒surface climate feedback response analysis method to quantitatively attribute the extreme warmth. Our results show distinct characteristics associated with the warm anomaly in January‒February and March‒April. This extreme Arctic warmth is largely explained by the positive contributions of atmospheric dynamics, which are dominated by horizontal advection in January‒February and by adiabatic heating and vertical terms in March‒April. Compared with January‒February, an increase in solar radiation leads to an enhanced positive contribution from surface albedo processes in March‒April. Water vapor processes provide considerable positive contribution during both periods. In contrast, surface dynamic processes provide positive contribution in January‒February but negative contribution in March‒April, while cloud processes provide nearly negative contribution during both periods, primarily through their longwave effects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Research Letters
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/adaed4
Primary Topic
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantitative attribution of 2016 extreme arctic warmth: comparison between late winter and early spring

Tuantuan Zhang, Kaiqiang Deng, Shengping He, Yi Deng et al.
Environmental Research Letters
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
article

Quantitative attribution of 2016 extreme arctic warmth: comparison between late winter and early spring

Tuantuan Zhang, Kaiqiang Deng, Shengping He, Yi Deng, Wei Yu, Ke Fan, Baoqiang Tian, Ho Nam Cheung, Song Yang, Deliang Chen, Junjie Zhu
article en

Abstract

Abstract A deep, large-scale warmth occurred in the Arctic from January to April 2016, but the roles of various physical processes in this period have not been quantified. Here, we utilize an updated version of the coupled atmosphere‒surface climate feedback response analysis method to quantitatively attribute the extreme warmth. Our results show distinct characteristics associated with the warm anomaly in January‒February and March‒April. This extreme Arctic warmth is largely explained by the positive contributions of atmospheric dynamics, which are dominated by horizontal advection in January‒February and by adiabatic heating and vertical terms in March‒April. Compared with January‒February, an increase in solar radiation leads to an enhanced positive contribution from surface albedo processes in March‒April. Water vapor processes provide considerable positive contribution during both periods. In contrast, surface dynamic processes provide positive contribution in January‒February but negative contribution in March‒April, while cloud processes provide nearly negative contribution during both periods, primarily through their longwave effects.

Environmental Research LettersVol. 20(2)
Georgia Institute of Technology (US), Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research (NO), Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou) (CN), Institute of Atmospheric Physics (CN), University of Bergen (NO), University of Gothenburg (SE), University of Hong Kong (HK), Tsinghua University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.