Evaluating analytical approaches for smarter decision-making in faecal contamination monitoring and assessment

Quantification of faecal indicator organism (FIO) is essential for surveillance monitoring, performance compliance and public health interventions. IDEXX's automated FIO detection technique, TECTA<sup>TM</sup>, and IDEXX Colilert offer greater efficiency than traditional methods but have not been critically compared across diverse levels of faecal contamination or evaluated against key practical requirements and cost factors. This study compared the use of IDEXX Colilert and TECTA™ for measuring indicative contamination in 785 samples from drinking water, wells, surface water, greywater and a constructed wetland system, collected from Fijian and Indonesian informal settlements. Both methods ranked sample types in the same order in terms of indicative faecal contamination, and at Escherichia coli (E. coli) concentrations between <1-10<sup>5</sup> CFU or MPN/100 mL (municipal, shallow and deep well samples), both methods were highly correlated. However, at 10<sup>2</sup>-10<sup>9</sup> CFU/100 mL (TECTA™) or 10<sup>2</sup>-10<sup>6</sup> MPN/100 mL (IDEXX Colilert) E. coli (surface water samples), a moderate positive correlation was observed (R = 0.56, p = 2.2<sup>-13</sup>), and a high proportion of samples exceeded the detection limit of the IDEXX Colilert method. Greywater and septic tank samples exhibited total coliform mean values greater than 10<sup>6</sup> CFU/100 mL, with no correlation between IDEXX Colilert and TECTA™ results. TECTA™ required only one dilution for returning specific E. coli values, ideal for performance compliance and faecal contamination assessments, while IDEXX Colilert often needed two levels of dilution. For surveillance purposes, IDEXX Colilert may be more cost-effective given the higher initial setup costs of TECTA™; however, TECTA™'s faster turnaround times and automated results may offset expenses. This study presents a versatile decision analysis that enables laboratories worldwide to customise method comparisons based on their unique requirements, driving more effective implementation and global standardisation of these methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water Research
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2025.123207
Primary Topic
Fecal contamination and water quality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating analytical approaches for smarter decision-making in faecal contamination monitoring and assessment

Maghfira Saifuddaolah, Kerrie Burge, Rebekah Henry, Karin S Leder et al.
Water Research
Fecal contamination and water quality
article

Evaluating analytical approaches for smarter decision-making in faecal contamination monitoring and assessment

Maghfira Saifuddaolah, Kerrie Burge, Rebekah Henry, Karin S Leder, Christelle Schang, Fiona Barker, Brandon K. Winfrey, David McCarthy, Yussi M Palacios Delgado, Vinaina Waqa
article en

Abstract

Quantification of faecal indicator organism (FIO) is essential for surveillance monitoring, performance compliance and public health interventions. IDEXX's automated FIO detection technique, TECTA<sup>TM</sup>, and IDEXX Colilert offer greater efficiency than traditional methods but have not been critically compared across diverse levels of faecal contamination or evaluated against key practical requirements and cost factors. This study compared the use of IDEXX Colilert and TECTA™ for measuring indicative contamination in 785 samples from drinking water, wells, surface water, greywater and a constructed wetland system, collected from Fijian and Indonesian informal settlements. Both methods ranked sample types in the same order in terms of indicative faecal contamination, and at Escherichia coli (E. coli) concentrations between <1-10<sup>5</sup> CFU or MPN/100 mL (municipal, shallow and deep well samples), both methods were highly correlated. However, at 10<sup>2</sup>-10<sup>9</sup> CFU/100 mL (TECTA™) or 10<sup>2</sup>-10<sup>6</sup> MPN/100 mL (IDEXX Colilert) E. coli (surface water samples), a moderate positive correlation was observed (R = 0.56, p = 2.2<sup>-13</sup>), and a high proportion of samples exceeded the detection limit of the IDEXX Colilert method. Greywater and septic tank samples exhibited total coliform mean values greater than 10<sup>6</sup> CFU/100 mL, with no correlation between IDEXX Colilert and TECTA™ results. TECTA™ required only one dilution for returning specific E. coli values, ideal for performance compliance and faecal contamination assessments, while IDEXX Colilert often needed two levels of dilution. For surveillance purposes, IDEXX Colilert may be more cost-effective given the higher initial setup costs of TECTA™; however, TECTA™'s faster turnaround times and automated results may offset expenses. This study presents a versatile decision analysis that enables laboratories worldwide to customise method comparisons based on their unique requirements, driving more effective implementation and global standardisation of these methods.

Water ResearchVol. 275
The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU), University of Victoria (CA), Monash Health (AU), Monash University (AU), Fiji National University (FJ), University of Guelph (CA), Hasanuddin University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Fecal contamination and water quality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.