Multimodal Document Analytics for Banking Process Automation

Traditional banks are increasingly challenged by FinTechs, particularly in leveraging advanced technologies to enhance operational efficiency. Our study addresses this by focusing on improving the efficiency of document-intensive business processes in banking. We review the landscape of business documents in the customer banking segment, which often includes text, layout, and visuals, indicating that more than plain NLP is required for effective document analytics and process automation. We evaluate multimodal models that integrate these elements, analyzing the interplay of text, layout, and visual components. Our comparative analysis features multimodal, cross-lingual models such as LayoutXLM and includes comparisons with large language models like GPT-4, contrasting their capabilities with traditional unimodal models like BERT and GPT-3.5. The results confirm that LayoutXLM significantly outperforms both unimodal classifiers and other large multimodal models in processing complex banking documents, leveraging integrated visual and layout cues effectively. Remarkably, with as little as 250 document pages covering 10 different token classes used for fine-tuning, LayoutXLM achieves an F1 score exceeding 75%, demonstrating its efficient few-shot learning capabilities. In our ablation studies, we demonstrate that multimodal systems can achieve significant performance improvements with limited labeled data, effectively managing class imbalance. This enhances their deployment and scalability, highlighting their transformative potential in document-intensive processes. Overall, this paper contributes original empirical evidence on the superior efficiency and effectiveness of layout-aware multimodal models like LayoutXLM, along with practical banking document analytics insights. • Explore the banking document landscape for NLP-based process optimization. • Investigate the need of multimodal models in complex banking document analytics. • Compare multimodal, cross-lingual models like LayoutXLM and GPT-4. • Evaluate the importance of visual and layout components in multimodal models. • Study class imbalance and compare multimodal integration with GPT-3.5 and BERT.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information Fusion
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2025.102973
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Business Process Modeling and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multimodal Document Analytics for Banking Process Automation

Christopher Gerling, Stefan Lessmann
5 citations
Information Fusion
Business Process Modeling and Analysis
11.42
article

Multimodal Document Analytics for Banking Process Automation

Christopher Gerling, Stefan Lessmann
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Traditional banks are increasingly challenged by FinTechs, particularly in leveraging advanced technologies to enhance operational efficiency. Our study addresses this by focusing on improving the efficiency of document-intensive business processes in banking. We review the landscape of business documents in the customer banking segment, which often includes text, layout, and visuals, indicating that more than plain NLP is required for effective document analytics and process automation. We evaluate multimodal models that integrate these elements, analyzing the interplay of text, layout, and visual components. Our comparative analysis features multimodal, cross-lingual models such as LayoutXLM and includes comparisons with large language models like GPT-4, contrasting their capabilities with traditional unimodal models like BERT and GPT-3.5. The results confirm that LayoutXLM significantly outperforms both unimodal classifiers and other large multimodal models in processing complex banking documents, leveraging integrated visual and layout cues effectively. Remarkably, with as little as 250 document pages covering 10 different token classes used for fine-tuning, LayoutXLM achieves an F1 score exceeding 75%, demonstrating its efficient few-shot learning capabilities. In our ablation studies, we demonstrate that multimodal systems can achieve significant performance improvements with limited labeled data, effectively managing class imbalance. This enhances their deployment and scalability, highlighting their transformative potential in document-intensive processes. Overall, this paper contributes original empirical evidence on the superior efficiency and effectiveness of layout-aware multimodal models like LayoutXLM, along with practical banking document analytics insights. • Explore the banking document landscape for NLP-based process optimization. • Investigate the need of multimodal models in complex banking document analytics. • Compare multimodal, cross-lingual models like LayoutXLM and GPT-4. • Evaluate the importance of visual and layout components in multimodal models. • Study class imbalance and compare multimodal integration with GPT-3.5 and BERT.

Information FusionVol. 118
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), Bucharest University of Economic Studies (RO)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Business Process Modeling and Analysis
11.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.