Exploring Possible Drug-Resistant Variants of SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease (M<sup>pro</sup>) with Noncovalent Preclinical Candidate, Mpro61

SARS-CoV-2 M<sup>pro</sup> inhibitors, such as nirmatrelvir, have proven efficacy in clinical use. Nirmatrelvir was developed in a target-based approach against wild-type M<sup>pro</sup>, with the anticipation that prolonged usage may cause enrichment of drug-resistant mutations and persistence of COVID infections. Although globally prevalent drug-resistant mutations have not yet been observed, individual cases have recently been reported among patients following treatment with Paxlovid-a formulation of nirmatrelvir. Mutations E166V and E166A have been detected in these drug-resistant clinical isolates, consistent with predictions from <i>in vitro</i> viral passage experiments and therefore necessitate ongoing drug development. In this study, we selected seven M<sup>pro</sup> variants (T21I, L50F, E166V, A173V, T190I, E166V/L50F, and A173V/L50F), which have been repeatedly found in viral passage experiments. We investigated their kinetic and structural properties, as well as resistance level to M<sup>pro</sup> inhibitors: nirmatrelvir, GC376-a similar peptidomimetic for feline COVID infections, and our in-house-developed nonpeptidomimetic inhibitor Mpro61. Mpro61 maintains potency against the single variants (except for E166V) and the A173/L50F double variant, with <i>K</i> <sub>i</sub> values similar to those of the wild type. In contrast, while nirmatrelvir and GC376 were still effective against the A173V/L50F double variant, their <i>K</i> <sub>i</sub> values significantly increased up to 10-fold. None of the inhibitors appeared to be potent against E166V-containing variants. Our structural analysis revealed a significant movement of Ser1 residue in all E166V-containing variants in the presence or absence of an inhibitor. The new orientation of the Ser1 suggested potential strategies for medicinal chemistry modifications of Mpro61 to enhance hydrogen-bonding interactions between these variants and Mpro61 derivatives. These studies provide critical insights into guiding the future design of additional Mpro61 derivatives that would potentially inhibit variants with the pan-drug-resistant E166V mutation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Bio & Med Chem Au
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomedchemau.4c00109
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.50
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Possible Drug-Resistant Variants of SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease (Mpro) with Noncovalent Preclinical Candidate, Mpro61

Christina Papini, Su Tang, Karen S. Anderson, William L. Jorgensen et al.
1 citations
ACS Bio & Med Chem Au
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
1.50
article

Exploring Possible Drug-Resistant Variants of SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease (Mpro) with Noncovalent Preclinical Candidate, Mpro61

Christina Papini, Su Tang, Karen S. Anderson, William L. Jorgensen, Chunhui Zhang, K Huynh, Jessica R. Kenneson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

SARS-CoV-2 M<sup>pro</sup> inhibitors, such as nirmatrelvir, have proven efficacy in clinical use. Nirmatrelvir was developed in a target-based approach against wild-type M<sup>pro</sup>, with the anticipation that prolonged usage may cause enrichment of drug-resistant mutations and persistence of COVID infections. Although globally prevalent drug-resistant mutations have not yet been observed, individual cases have recently been reported among patients following treatment with Paxlovid-a formulation of nirmatrelvir. Mutations E166V and E166A have been detected in these drug-resistant clinical isolates, consistent with predictions from <i>in vitro</i> viral passage experiments and therefore necessitate ongoing drug development. In this study, we selected seven M<sup>pro</sup> variants (T21I, L50F, E166V, A173V, T190I, E166V/L50F, and A173V/L50F), which have been repeatedly found in viral passage experiments. We investigated their kinetic and structural properties, as well as resistance level to M<sup>pro</sup> inhibitors: nirmatrelvir, GC376-a similar peptidomimetic for feline COVID infections, and our in-house-developed nonpeptidomimetic inhibitor Mpro61. Mpro61 maintains potency against the single variants (except for E166V) and the A173/L50F double variant, with <i>K</i> <sub>i</sub> values similar to those of the wild type. In contrast, while nirmatrelvir and GC376 were still effective against the A173V/L50F double variant, their <i>K</i> <sub>i</sub> values significantly increased up to 10-fold. None of the inhibitors appeared to be potent against E166V-containing variants. Our structural analysis revealed a significant movement of Ser1 residue in all E166V-containing variants in the presence or absence of an inhibitor. The new orientation of the Ser1 suggested potential strategies for medicinal chemistry modifications of Mpro61 to enhance hydrogen-bonding interactions between these variants and Mpro61 derivatives. These studies provide critical insights into guiding the future design of additional Mpro61 derivatives that would potentially inhibit variants with the pan-drug-resistant E166V mutation.

ACS Bio & Med Chem AuVol. 5(1)
Yale University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
1.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.