The Observed Phase Space of Mass-loss History from Massive Stars Based on Radio Observations of a Large Supernova Sample

Abstract In this work, we study the circumstellar material (CSM) around massive stars, and the mass-loss rates depositing this CSM, using a large sample of radio observations of 325 core-collapse supernovae (CCSNe; only ~22% of them being detected). This sample comprises both archival data and our new observations of 99 CCSNe conducted with the AMI-LA radio array in a systematic approach devised to constrain the mass loss at different stages of stellar evolution. In the supernova (SN)–CSM interaction model, observing the peak of the radio emission of an SN provides the CSM density at a given radius (and therefore the mass-loss rate that deposited this CSM). On the other hand, limits on the radio emission, and/or on the peak of the radio emission provide a region in the CSM phase space that can be ruled out. Our analysis shows a discrepancy between the values of mass-loss rates derived from radio-detected and radio-nondetected SNe. Furthermore, we rule out mass-loss rates in the range of 2 × 10 −6 –10 −4 M ⊙ yr −1 for different epochs during the last 1000 yr before the explosion (assuming wind velocity of 10 km s −1 ) for the progenitors of ~80% of the Type II supernovae (SNe II) in our sample. In addition, we rule out the ranges of mass-loss rates suggested for red supergiants for ~50% of the progenitors of SNe II in our sample. We emphasize here that these results take a step forward in constraining mass loss in winds from a statistical point of view.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad9e93
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.62

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Observed Phase Space of Mass-loss History from Massive Stars Based on Radio Observations of a Large Supernova Sample

Lauren Rhodes, Itai Sfaradi, D. R. Williams, A. Horesh et al.
4 citations
The Astrophysical Journal
Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
4.62
article

The Observed Phase Space of Mass-loss History from Massive Stars Based on Radio Observations of a Large Supernova Sample

Lauren Rhodes, Itai Sfaradi, D. R. Williams, A. Horesh, Joe Bright, Rob Fender, David A. Green
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract In this work, we study the circumstellar material (CSM) around massive stars, and the mass-loss rates depositing this CSM, using a large sample of radio observations of 325 core-collapse supernovae (CCSNe; only ~22% of them being detected). This sample comprises both archival data and our new observations of 99 CCSNe conducted with the AMI-LA radio array in a systematic approach devised to constrain the mass loss at different stages of stellar evolution. In the supernova (SN)–CSM interaction model, observing the peak of the radio emission of an SN provides the CSM density at a given radius (and therefore the mass-loss rate that deposited this CSM). On the other hand, limits on the radio emission, and/or on the peak of the radio emission provide a region in the CSM phase space that can be ruled out. Our analysis shows a discrepancy between the values of mass-loss rates derived from radio-detected and radio-nondetected SNe. Furthermore, we rule out mass-loss rates in the range of 2 × 10 −6 –10 −4 M ⊙ yr −1 for different epochs during the last 1000 yr before the explosion (assuming wind velocity of 10 km s −1 ) for the progenitors of ~80% of the Type II supernovae (SNe II) in our sample. In addition, we rule out the ranges of mass-loss rates suggested for red supergiants for ~50% of the progenitors of SNe II in our sample. We emphasize here that these results take a step forward in constraining mass loss in winds from a statistical point of view.

The Astrophysical JournalVol. 979(2)
United States-Israel Binational Science Foundation, Israel Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
4.62
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.