Implementation of No Smoking Area Policy in Palu City

This study aims to determine the Implementation of the No Smoking Area Policy in Palu City. The type of research used is descriptive qualitative. The type of data used primary data and secondary data. Data collection techniques, conducted through observation, interviews, and documentation. The technique of withdrawing informants using purposive. The data analysis used is the Miles, Huberman and Saldana model, namely data collection, data presentation, data condensation and conclusion drawing. More efforts are needed to optimize the implementation of the smoke-free area policy in Palu City, including conducting a lot of education-based socialization about the dangers of cigarette smoke for both active and passive smokers, as well as instilling more understanding to every agency related to the implementation of smoke-free areas, because being free from cigarette smoke and breathing clean air is a community right guaranteed by the government. The smoke-free area (KTR) policy in Palu City has not been fully responded to by all policy stakeholders in Palu City. As a result, the implementation of the smoke-free area policy has not been effective. Based on the results of the research conducted, it can be concluded that the implementation of the smoke-free area policy in Palu City is relatively ineffective, due to several things, namely cross-sectoral communication has never been carried out by policy implementers. The consistency of the implementers of the smoke-free area (KTR) policy is still low. Socialization to the community is very minimal. Lack of community compliance, as well as non-enforcement of sanctions and fines for people who deliberately violate the smoke-free area policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Khazanah Sosial
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15575/ks.v6i3.42958
Primary Topic
Public Health and Nutrition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementation of No Smoking Area Policy in Palu City

M Syukur, Syahruddin Hattab, Nasir Mangngasing
Khazanah Sosial
Public Health and Nutrition
article

Implementation of No Smoking Area Policy in Palu City

M Syukur, Syahruddin Hattab, Nasir Mangngasing
article en

Abstract

This study aims to determine the Implementation of the No Smoking Area Policy in Palu City. The type of research used is descriptive qualitative. The type of data used primary data and secondary data. Data collection techniques, conducted through observation, interviews, and documentation. The technique of withdrawing informants using purposive. The data analysis used is the Miles, Huberman and Saldana model, namely data collection, data presentation, data condensation and conclusion drawing. More efforts are needed to optimize the implementation of the smoke-free area policy in Palu City, including conducting a lot of education-based socialization about the dangers of cigarette smoke for both active and passive smokers, as well as instilling more understanding to every agency related to the implementation of smoke-free areas, because being free from cigarette smoke and breathing clean air is a community right guaranteed by the government. The smoke-free area (KTR) policy in Palu City has not been fully responded to by all policy stakeholders in Palu City. As a result, the implementation of the smoke-free area policy has not been effective. Based on the results of the research conducted, it can be concluded that the implementation of the smoke-free area policy in Palu City is relatively ineffective, due to several things, namely cross-sectoral communication has never been carried out by policy implementers. The consistency of the implementers of the smoke-free area (KTR) policy is still low. Socialization to the community is very minimal. Lack of community compliance, as well as non-enforcement of sanctions and fines for people who deliberately violate the smoke-free area policy.

Khazanah SosialVol. 6(3)
Tadulako University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Public Health and Nutrition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.