The impact of water flow rates on bioaerosol production from handwashing basins

• Aerosols from handwashing basins can cause healthcare-associated infections. • Respirable aerosols were generated from contaminated drain. • Aerosol and droplet dispersion increased as flow rate decreased. • Low flow rates increased water pressure, generating more aerosols upon drain impact. • Findings stress need for research on design to reduce infection risks. Bioaerosols within the built environment pose a potential risk to public health. In healthcare settings, aerosols generated from handwashing basins have been receiving increasing attention due to their role in healthcare-associated infection outbreaks. Currently, there is limited knowledge regarding the impact of hand basin design parameters on bioaerosol production and transmission routes to patients. This study used a model hand basin system to investigate the effect of different flow rate restrictors on the number, size and distribution of bioaerosols produced. Source water was spiked with Escherichia coli and the hand basin drain seeded with Staphylococcus epidermis as indicator bacteria to facilitate tracking of the bioaerosol source. All three flow restrictors utilised generated bioaerosols of respirable size with no significant difference in the number of aerosols and droplets from the source water across different flow rates. However, lower flow rates led to a higher generation of aerosols from the drain and increased retrograde contamination from the drain to faucet compared to higher flow rates. These findings suggest that modifying design elements, such as aerator design and flow rates, could potentially reduce infection risks, but the optimal configuration remains unclear. This highlights the need for future collaborative research between product designers, engineers and microbiologists to inform optimum design and ensure functional needs are met whilst protecting occupants in healthcare and other high health-risk built environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Building and Environment
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.112624
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The impact of water flow rates on bioaerosol production from handwashing basins

Kirstin Ross, Melissa H. Brown, Claire Hayward, Harriet Whiley
3 citations
Building and Environment
Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
3.60
article

The impact of water flow rates on bioaerosol production from handwashing basins

Kirstin Ross, Melissa H. Brown, Claire Hayward, Harriet Whiley
article en
3 citations

Abstract

• Aerosols from handwashing basins can cause healthcare-associated infections. • Respirable aerosols were generated from contaminated drain. • Aerosol and droplet dispersion increased as flow rate decreased. • Low flow rates increased water pressure, generating more aerosols upon drain impact. • Findings stress need for research on design to reduce infection risks. Bioaerosols within the built environment pose a potential risk to public health. In healthcare settings, aerosols generated from handwashing basins have been receiving increasing attention due to their role in healthcare-associated infection outbreaks. Currently, there is limited knowledge regarding the impact of hand basin design parameters on bioaerosol production and transmission routes to patients. This study used a model hand basin system to investigate the effect of different flow rate restrictors on the number, size and distribution of bioaerosols produced. Source water was spiked with Escherichia coli and the hand basin drain seeded with Staphylococcus epidermis as indicator bacteria to facilitate tracking of the bioaerosol source. All three flow restrictors utilised generated bioaerosols of respirable size with no significant difference in the number of aerosols and droplets from the source water across different flow rates. However, lower flow rates led to a higher generation of aerosols from the drain and increased retrograde contamination from the drain to faucet compared to higher flow rates. These findings suggest that modifying design elements, such as aerator design and flow rates, could potentially reduce infection risks, but the optimal configuration remains unclear. This highlights the need for future collaborative research between product designers, engineers and microbiologists to inform optimum design and ensure functional needs are met whilst protecting occupants in healthcare and other high health-risk built environments.

Building and EnvironmentVol. 271
Australian Research Council (AU), Flinders University (AU)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
3.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.