Technical efficiency in agriculture: A decade-long meta-analysis of global research

Poverty and food insecurity remain a glaring reality, particularly in regions linked to dryland agriculture. Low agricultural productivity due to inefficient input use reduces the prospects of improving the circumstances many rural households face due to these challenges. This highlights the need to understand factors affecting efficiency indices from several published studies, including shedding light on whether efficiency has increased over time. In this comprehensive meta-analysis spanning a decade (2014–2023), we shed new light on the evolving landscape of global technical efficiency in the agricultural sector, assuming that the institutional environment has changed over time. The literature search yielded 289 published articles and 549 observations for analysis. The beta regression meta-analysis results indicate that the translog functional form leads to higher mean technical efficiency values than the cobb-Douglas and other functional forms, while panel data studies yield lower mean technical efficiency values than cross-sectional studies. This emphasizes the need to select the most suitable functional form based on the data and model specification tests. Measures should be taken to eliminate selection bias in efficiency-related cross-sectional studies. Technical efficiency in agricultural enterprises globally increases with publication year with an average mean of 0.72. Over the past decade, the major efficiency drivers include farm size, extension support, credit access, and education, influencing efficiency positively, while subsidies have had the greatest negative effect on efficiency. Policies that enhance extension support, credit access, participation of the educated in commercial farming and scaling down of subsidy programs should be strengthened to improve global agricultural productivity. • Our meta-analysis focuses on global technical efficiency published studies in agriculture over the past decade (2014–2023). • The beta regression meta-analysis model was used. • Technical efficiency in agricultural enterprises globally increases with publication year with an average mean of 0.72. • The translog functional form leads to higher mean technical efficiency values than the cobb-Douglas and other functional forms, while panel data studies yield lower mean technical efficiency values than cross-sectional studies. • Over the past decade, the major positive efficiency drivers include farm size, extension support, credit access, and education, while subsidies have had the greatest negative effect on efficiency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Agriculture and Food Research
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2025.101667
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
23.17
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Technical efficiency in agriculture: A decade-long meta-analysis of global research

Abbyssinia Mushunje, Freddy Ruzhani
11 citations
Journal of Agriculture and Food Research
Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
23.17
article

Technical efficiency in agriculture: A decade-long meta-analysis of global research

Abbyssinia Mushunje, Freddy Ruzhani
article en
11 citations

Abstract

Poverty and food insecurity remain a glaring reality, particularly in regions linked to dryland agriculture. Low agricultural productivity due to inefficient input use reduces the prospects of improving the circumstances many rural households face due to these challenges. This highlights the need to understand factors affecting efficiency indices from several published studies, including shedding light on whether efficiency has increased over time. In this comprehensive meta-analysis spanning a decade (2014–2023), we shed new light on the evolving landscape of global technical efficiency in the agricultural sector, assuming that the institutional environment has changed over time. The literature search yielded 289 published articles and 549 observations for analysis. The beta regression meta-analysis results indicate that the translog functional form leads to higher mean technical efficiency values than the cobb-Douglas and other functional forms, while panel data studies yield lower mean technical efficiency values than cross-sectional studies. This emphasizes the need to select the most suitable functional form based on the data and model specification tests. Measures should be taken to eliminate selection bias in efficiency-related cross-sectional studies. Technical efficiency in agricultural enterprises globally increases with publication year with an average mean of 0.72. Over the past decade, the major efficiency drivers include farm size, extension support, credit access, and education, influencing efficiency positively, while subsidies have had the greatest negative effect on efficiency. Policies that enhance extension support, credit access, participation of the educated in commercial farming and scaling down of subsidy programs should be strengthened to improve global agricultural productivity. • Our meta-analysis focuses on global technical efficiency published studies in agriculture over the past decade (2014–2023). • The beta regression meta-analysis model was used. • Technical efficiency in agricultural enterprises globally increases with publication year with an average mean of 0.72. • The translog functional form leads to higher mean technical efficiency values than the cobb-Douglas and other functional forms, while panel data studies yield lower mean technical efficiency values than cross-sectional studies. • Over the past decade, the major positive efficiency drivers include farm size, extension support, credit access, and education, while subsidies have had the greatest negative effect on efficiency.

Journal of Agriculture and Food ResearchVol. 19
University of Fort Hare (ZA)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
23.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.