<i>In vitro</i> digested ingredients as substitute for ileal digesta in assessing protein fermentation potential in growing pigs

Understanding protein fermentation in the hindgut of pigs is essential due to its implications for health, and ileal digesta is commonly used to study this process <i>in vitro</i>. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of utilising <i>in vitro</i> digested residues as a replacement for ileal digesta in evaluating the protein fermentation potential. <i>In vitro</i> residues from cottonseed meal, maize germ meal, peanut meal, rapeseed cake, rapeseed meal, soyabean meal and sunflower meal were analysed using a modified gas production (GP) technique and curve fitting model to determine their fermentation dynamics and compare with the use of ileal digesta. Significant variations were observed in GP parameters between <i>in vitro</i> digested residues, indicating differences in nitrogen utilisation by fecal microbiota. Soyabean meal and sunflower meal exhibited the highest maximum GP rates (R<sub>max</sub>), with values of 29·5 ± 0·6 and 28·0 ± 1·2 ml/h, respectively, while maize germ meal showed slowest protein utilisation (17·3 ± 0·2 ml/h). A positive relationship was found between the R<sub>max</sub> of <i>in vitro</i> residues and ileal digesta (R<sup>2</sup> = 0·85, <i>P</i> < 0·01). However, GP potential (GP<sub>s</sub>) showed a tendency for a negative relationship (R<sup>2</sup> = 0·39, <i>P</i> < 0·1), likely due to narrow observed GP<sub>s</sub> values and the presence of varied endogenous proteins in ileal digesta. Our results demonstrate the potential of using <i>in vitro</i> digested residues as a substitute for ileal digesta in assessing the fermentation potential of protein ingredients, particularly regarding the rate of protein fermentation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal Of Nutrition
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007114525000108
Primary Topic
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In vitro digested ingredients as substitute for ileal digesta in assessing protein fermentation potential in growing pigs

W.H. Hendriks, Arie K. Kies, Nikkie van der Wielen, J.W. Cone et al.
British Journal Of Nutrition
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
article

In vitro digested ingredients as substitute for ileal digesta in assessing protein fermentation potential in growing pigs

W.H. Hendriks, Arie K. Kies, Nikkie van der Wielen, J.W. Cone, Hanlu Zhang
article en

Abstract

Understanding protein fermentation in the hindgut of pigs is essential due to its implications for health, and ileal digesta is commonly used to study this process <i>in vitro</i>. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of utilising <i>in vitro</i> digested residues as a replacement for ileal digesta in evaluating the protein fermentation potential. <i>In vitro</i> residues from cottonseed meal, maize germ meal, peanut meal, rapeseed cake, rapeseed meal, soyabean meal and sunflower meal were analysed using a modified gas production (GP) technique and curve fitting model to determine their fermentation dynamics and compare with the use of ileal digesta. Significant variations were observed in GP parameters between <i>in vitro</i> digested residues, indicating differences in nitrogen utilisation by fecal microbiota. Soyabean meal and sunflower meal exhibited the highest maximum GP rates (R<sub>max</sub>), with values of 29·5 ± 0·6 and 28·0 ± 1·2 ml/h, respectively, while maize germ meal showed slowest protein utilisation (17·3 ± 0·2 ml/h). A positive relationship was found between the R<sub>max</sub> of <i>in vitro</i> residues and ileal digesta (R<sup>2</sup> = 0·85, <i>P</i> < 0·01). However, GP potential (GP<sub>s</sub>) showed a tendency for a negative relationship (R<sup>2</sup> = 0·39, <i>P</i> < 0·1), likely due to narrow observed GP<sub>s</sub> values and the presence of varied endogenous proteins in ileal digesta. Our results demonstrate the potential of using <i>in vitro</i> digested residues as a substitute for ileal digesta in assessing the fermentation potential of protein ingredients, particularly regarding the rate of protein fermentation.

British Journal Of NutritionVol. 133(3)
Endesa (Spain) (ES), China Agricultural University (CN), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Wageningen University and Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.