Multi-institutional evaluation comparing guidance from International Ki67 Working Group vs National Health Commission of China on immunohistochemistry-based Ki67 assessment alongside the Quantitative Dot Blot method

The IKWG recommendation was harder to achieve categorized agreement among pathologists than the NHCC recommendation, yet it led to the best agreement with the QDB to define the low-risk group. The QDB method offers significantly improved consistency compared to the current IHC-based Ki67 assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Oncology
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1510273
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.94

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-institutional evaluation comparing guidance from International Ki67 Working Group vs National Health Commission of China on immunohistochemistry-based Ki67 assessment alongside the Quantitative Dot Blot method

Zhiqiang Lang, Bing Xiang Yang, Yuhuan Wang, Meiren Li et al.
1 citations
Frontiers in Oncology
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
0.94
article

Multi-institutional evaluation comparing guidance from International Ki67 Working Group vs National Health Commission of China on immunohistochemistry-based Ki67 assessment alongside the Quantitative Dot Blot method

Zhiqiang Lang, Bing Xiang Yang, Yuhuan Wang, Meiren Li, Jiu Wang, Hengming Zhang, Zihan Zhu, Zilan Zhang, Jiarui Zou, Yanqing Kong, Guohua Yu, Qinghua Cao, Guihong Dai, Yan Shen Peng, Junmei Hao, Yang Lin, Chao Liu, Cuiping Zhang, Chunhui Liu, Bichen Xie, Xue Gong, Hai-Yan Shi, Jinyan Jiang, Yin Wang, Luting Zhou, P H Fan, Chenjia Lu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The IKWG recommendation was harder to achieve categorized agreement among pathologists than the NHCC recommendation, yet it led to the best agreement with the QDB to define the low-risk group. The QDB method offers significantly improved consistency compared to the current IHC-based Ki67 assessment.

Frontiers in OncologyVol. 14
Qingdao University (CN), Jiangnan University (CN), Jiujiang University (CN), Binzhou Medical University (CN), Shandong University of Aeronautics (CN), Nantong University (CN), Ruijin Hospital (CN), Yuhuangding Hospital (CN), Soochow University (CN), Qinghai University Affiliated Hospital (CN), Integrated Chinese Medicine (China) (HK), Shenzhen Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital (CN), ShenZhen People’s Hospital (CN), Weifang People's Hospital (CN), Wuxi Fourth People's Hospital (CN), People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (CN), The Affiliated Taizhou People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (CN), Henan Provincial People's Hospital (CN), Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital (CN), Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences (CN), Hangzhou Red Cross Hospital (CN), Chenzhou First People's Hospital (CN), Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (CN), Southern Medical University (CN), Nanjing Medical University (CN)
Binzhou Medical University
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
0.94
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.