Changes in HER2 Amplification Status for Breast Cancer Patients After Immunohistochemistry Directed In Situ Hybridization

The 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines for HER2 testing for breast cancer implemented the addition of immunohistochemistry (IHC) directed in situ hybridization (ISH) recount to resolve equivocal results. The implementation of an additional 2+ IHC-directed ISH recount adds additional complexity to the testing workflow for an unclear impact on HER2 results. A retrospective review of all equivocal ISH cases (groups 2, 3, and 4) that underwent 2+ IHC-directed ISH, since the 2018 guidelines, which were finalized as either amplified or not amplified, was performed. HER2 group number and final HER2 amplification status frequently changed after IHC guided ISH assessment, which was due to significant changes in HER2/CEP17 ratio and average HER2 signal number per cell. Equivocal groups 2, 3, and 4 samples with a result of HER2 amplified after 2+ IHC-directed ISH counts were closer to the threshold for amplification on the original ISH count, yet their counts also increased significantly after IHC-directed count in comparison to those samples, which were not amplified. Groups 2 and 4 ISH counts significantly increased after IHC directed ISH for HER2/CEP17 ratio and HER2 signal number per cell. This study represents the most extensive examination of efforts to resolve equivocal HER2 ISH results, highlighting a significant shift in therapeutic options after IHC-guided ISH for a subset of breast cancer patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/pai.0000000000001247
Citations
1
Primary Topic
HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Changes in HER2 Amplification Status for Breast Cancer Patients After Immunohistochemistry Directed In Situ Hybridization

Kajsa E. Affolter, Parisa Adelhardt, Phuong Tran, Lesley Lomo et al.
1 citations
Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology
HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
1.05
article

Changes in HER2 Amplification Status for Breast Cancer Patients After Immunohistochemistry Directed In Situ Hybridization

Kajsa E. Affolter, Parisa Adelhardt, Phuong Tran, Lesley Lomo, Jolanta Jedrzkiewicz, Meghan Maughan, Maarika Gering, Ana Lorena Ruano, Deepika Sirohi, J. Kim, Diane M. Wilcock, Derek Bradshaw, Kristina H. Moore, Jonathan Mahlow, Allison S. Cleary, Cameron Beech, Georgios Deftereos, Richard Davis, Joshua F. Coleman, Leslie R. Rowe, Evin Gulbahce, Daniel J. Albertson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines for HER2 testing for breast cancer implemented the addition of immunohistochemistry (IHC) directed in situ hybridization (ISH) recount to resolve equivocal results. The implementation of an additional 2+ IHC-directed ISH recount adds additional complexity to the testing workflow for an unclear impact on HER2 results. A retrospective review of all equivocal ISH cases (groups 2, 3, and 4) that underwent 2+ IHC-directed ISH, since the 2018 guidelines, which were finalized as either amplified or not amplified, was performed. HER2 group number and final HER2 amplification status frequently changed after IHC guided ISH assessment, which was due to significant changes in HER2/CEP17 ratio and average HER2 signal number per cell. Equivocal groups 2, 3, and 4 samples with a result of HER2 amplified after 2+ IHC-directed ISH counts were closer to the threshold for amplification on the original ISH count, yet their counts also increased significantly after IHC-directed count in comparison to those samples, which were not amplified. Groups 2 and 4 ISH counts significantly increased after IHC directed ISH for HER2/CEP17 ratio and HER2 signal number per cell. This study represents the most extensive examination of efforts to resolve equivocal HER2 ISH results, highlighting a significant shift in therapeutic options after IHC-guided ISH for a subset of breast cancer patients.

Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphologyVol. 33(2)
University of California, San Francisco (US), University of Utah (US), ARUP Laboratories (United States) (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
1.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.