CEERS: Increasing Scatter along the Star-forming Main Sequence Indicates Early Galaxies Form in Bursts
Abstract We present the star formation rate–stellar mass (SFR– M * ) relation for galaxies in the Cosmic Evolution Early Release Science survey at 4.5 ≤ z ≤ 12. We model the JWST and Hubble Space Telescope rest-UV and rest-optical photometry of galaxies with flexible star formation histories (SFHs) using BAGPIPES. We consider SFRs averaged from the SFHs over 10 Myr (SFR 10 ) and 100 Myr (SFR 100 ), where the photometry probes SFRs on these timescales, effectively tracing nebular emission lines in the rest-optical (on ~10 Myr timescales) and the UV/optical continuum (on ~100 Myr timescales). We measure the slope, normalization and intrinsic scatter of the SFR– M * relation, taking into account the uncertainty and the covariance of galaxy SFRs and M * . From z ~ 5 to 9 there is larger scatter in the SFR 10 – M * relation, with <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mi>σ</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>log</mml:mi> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>100</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.4</mml:mn> </mml:math> dex, compared to the SFR 100 – M * relation, with <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mi>σ</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>log</mml:mi> <mml:mi>S</mml:mi> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>R</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.1</mml:mn> </mml:math> dex. This scatter increases with redshift and increasing stellar mass, at least out to z ~ 7. These results can be explained if galaxies at higher redshift experience an increase in star formation variability and form primarily in short, active periods, followed by a lull in star formation (i.e., “napping” phases). We see a significant trend in the ratio R SFR = SFR 10 /SFR 100 in which, on average, R SFR decreases with increasing stellar mass and increasing redshift. This yields a star formation “duty cycle” of ~40% for galaxies with <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mi>log</mml:mi> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>*</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>⊙</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>≥</mml:mo> <mml:mn>9.3</mml:mn> </mml:math> at z ~ 5, declining to ~20% at z ~ 9. Galaxies also experience longer lulls in star formation at higher redshift and at higher stellar mass, such that galaxies transition from periods of higher SFR variability at z ≳ 6 to smoother SFR evolution at z ≲ 4.5.
Authors
- G. Rodighiero
- Ray A. Lucas (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1581-7825)
- Mauro Giavalisco (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7831-8751)
- Stephen M. Wilkins (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3903-6935)
- Avishai Dekel (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4174-0374)
- Alexander de la Vega (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6219-5558)
- Kaila Ronayne (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5749-5452)
- Nimish P. Hathi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6145-5090)
- Justin W. Cole (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6348-1900)
- Sandro Tacchella (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8224-4505)
- Pablo Arrabal Haro (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7959-8783)
- Casey Papovich (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7503-8482)
- Anton M. Koekemoer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6610-2048)
- Rachana Bhatawdekar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0883-2226)
- Bahram Mobasher (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5846-4404)
- Benjamin J. Weiner (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6065-7483)
- Pablo G. Pérez‐González (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4528-5639)
- Antonello Calabrò (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2536-1614)
- Laure Ciesla (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0541-2891)
- L. Y. Aaron Yung (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3466-035X)
- Benne W. Holwerda (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4884-6756)
- Kartheik G. Iyer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9298-3523)
- Nikko J. Cleri (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7151-009X)
- Steven L. Finkelstein (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8519-1130)
- Mark Dickinson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5414-5131)
- R. Amorín (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5758-1000)
- Micaela B. Bagley (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9921-9218)
- Eric Gawiser (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1530-8713)
- Ryan Endsley (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4564-2771)
- Jeyhan S. Kartaltepe (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9187-3605)
- Sara Mascia (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9572-7813)
- Michaela Hirschmann (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3301-3321)
Institutions
- Laboratoire d’Astrophysique de Marseille (FR)
- Château Gombert (FR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Published
- 2025-01-27
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad9a6a
- Citations
- 35
- Primary Topic
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 40.42
Funders
- Science and Technology Facilities Council