CEERS: Increasing Scatter along the Star-forming Main Sequence Indicates Early Galaxies Form in Bursts

Abstract We present the star formation rate–stellar mass (SFR– M * ) relation for galaxies in the Cosmic Evolution Early Release Science survey at 4.5 ≤ z ≤ 12. We model the JWST and Hubble Space Telescope rest-UV and rest-optical photometry of galaxies with flexible star formation histories (SFHs) using BAGPIPES. We consider SFRs averaged from the SFHs over 10 Myr (SFR 10 ) and 100 Myr (SFR 100 ), where the photometry probes SFRs on these timescales, effectively tracing nebular emission lines in the rest-optical (on ~10 Myr timescales) and the UV/optical continuum (on ~100 Myr timescales). We measure the slope, normalization and intrinsic scatter of the SFR– M * relation, taking into account the uncertainty and the covariance of galaxy SFRs and M * . From z ~ 5 to 9 there is larger scatter in the SFR 10 – M * relation, with <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mi>σ</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>log</mml:mi> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>100</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.4</mml:mn> </mml:math> dex, compared to the SFR 100 – M * relation, with <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mi>σ</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>log</mml:mi> <mml:mi>S</mml:mi> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>R</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.1</mml:mn> </mml:math> dex. This scatter increases with redshift and increasing stellar mass, at least out to z ~ 7. These results can be explained if galaxies at higher redshift experience an increase in star formation variability and form primarily in short, active periods, followed by a lull in star formation (i.e., “napping” phases). We see a significant trend in the ratio R SFR = SFR 10 /SFR 100 in which, on average, R SFR decreases with increasing stellar mass and increasing redshift. This yields a star formation “duty cycle” of ~40% for galaxies with <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mi>log</mml:mi> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>*</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>⊙</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>≥</mml:mo> <mml:mn>9.3</mml:mn> </mml:math> at z ~ 5, declining to ~20% at z ~ 9. Galaxies also experience longer lulls in star formation at higher redshift and at higher stellar mass, such that galaxies transition from periods of higher SFR variability at z ≳ 6 to smoother SFR evolution at z ≲ 4.5.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad9a6a
Citations
35
Primary Topic
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
40.42

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CEERS: Increasing Scatter along the Star-forming Main Sequence Indicates Early Galaxies Form in Bursts

G. Rodighiero, Ray A. Lucas, Mauro Giavalisco, Stephen M. Wilkins et al.
35 citations
The Astrophysical Journal
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
40.42
article

CEERS: Increasing Scatter along the Star-forming Main Sequence Indicates Early Galaxies Form in Bursts

G. Rodighiero, Ray A. Lucas, Mauro Giavalisco, Stephen M. Wilkins, Avishai Dekel, Alexander de la Vega, Kaila Ronayne, Nimish P. Hathi, Justin W. Cole, Sandro Tacchella, Pablo Arrabal Haro, Casey Papovich, Anton M. Koekemoer, Rachana Bhatawdekar, Bahram Mobasher, Benjamin J. Weiner, Pablo G. Pérez‐González, Antonello Calabrò, Laure Ciesla, L. Y. Aaron Yung, Benne W. Holwerda, Kartheik G. Iyer, Nikko J. Cleri, Steven L. Finkelstein, Mark Dickinson, R. Amorín, Micaela B. Bagley, Eric Gawiser, Ryan Endsley, Jeyhan S. Kartaltepe, Sara Mascia, Michaela Hirschmann
article en
35 citations

Abstract

Abstract We present the star formation rate–stellar mass (SFR– M * ) relation for galaxies in the Cosmic Evolution Early Release Science survey at 4.5 ≤ z ≤ 12. We model the JWST and Hubble Space Telescope rest-UV and rest-optical photometry of galaxies with flexible star formation histories (SFHs) using BAGPIPES. We consider SFRs averaged from the SFHs over 10 Myr (SFR 10 ) and 100 Myr (SFR 100 ), where the photometry probes SFRs on these timescales, effectively tracing nebular emission lines in the rest-optical (on ~10 Myr timescales) and the UV/optical continuum (on ~100 Myr timescales). We measure the slope, normalization and intrinsic scatter of the SFR– M * relation, taking into account the uncertainty and the covariance of galaxy SFRs and M * . From z ~ 5 to 9 there is larger scatter in the SFR 10 – M * relation, with <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mi>σ</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>log</mml:mi> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>100</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.4</mml:mn> </mml:math> dex, compared to the SFR 100 – M * relation, with <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mi>σ</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>log</mml:mi> <mml:mi>S</mml:mi> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>R</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.1</mml:mn> </mml:math> dex. This scatter increases with redshift and increasing stellar mass, at least out to z ~ 7. These results can be explained if galaxies at higher redshift experience an increase in star formation variability and form primarily in short, active periods, followed by a lull in star formation (i.e., “napping” phases). We see a significant trend in the ratio R SFR = SFR 10 /SFR 100 in which, on average, R SFR decreases with increasing stellar mass and increasing redshift. This yields a star formation “duty cycle” of ~40% for galaxies with <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mi>log</mml:mi> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>*</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>⊙</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>≥</mml:mo> <mml:mn>9.3</mml:mn> </mml:math> at z ~ 5, declining to ~20% at z ~ 9. Galaxies also experience longer lulls in star formation at higher redshift and at higher stellar mass, such that galaxies transition from periods of higher SFR variability at z ≳ 6 to smoother SFR evolution at z ≲ 4.5.

The Astrophysical JournalVol. 979(2)
Laboratoire d’Astrophysique de Marseille (FR), Château Gombert (FR)
Science and Technology Facilities Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
40.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.