Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with semitendinosus graft, comparative study of two tibial fixation devices

Many options are available concerning the graft fixation in ACL reconstruction, one of them being a suspensory device. Our study aimed to compare the strength of two different devices of fixation (suspensory device vs screw) on the tibia. We enrolled 80 patients older than 18 years with an isolated ACL tear confirmed at the MRI, divided into two comparative groups for a prospective study. The only factor which changed was the tibial fixation. The surgical treatment, performed by a unique surgeon, used the same inside-out technique for the two groups, with a ST4-strand graft. Various intraoperative parameters were studied like the time of the tourniquet, the diameter of the graft or an associated meniscus tear. The AP knee laxity was evaluated at 6 months and 1 year after the surgery by a TELOS test. We also compared the two groups with subjective and objective surveys. We can conclude that the suspensory device can offer the same strengthening.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Orthopaedica Belgica
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52628/90.4.12152
Primary Topic
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with semitendinosus graft, comparative study of two tibial fixation devices

Jérémy Daxhelet, Christope de Lavigne, C Parmentier, L DEBARRE
Acta Orthopaedica Belgica
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
article

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with semitendinosus graft, comparative study of two tibial fixation devices

Jérémy Daxhelet, Christope de Lavigne, C Parmentier, L DEBARRE
article en

Abstract

Many options are available concerning the graft fixation in ACL reconstruction, one of them being a suspensory device. Our study aimed to compare the strength of two different devices of fixation (suspensory device vs screw) on the tibia. We enrolled 80 patients older than 18 years with an isolated ACL tear confirmed at the MRI, divided into two comparative groups for a prospective study. The only factor which changed was the tibial fixation. The surgical treatment, performed by a unique surgeon, used the same inside-out technique for the two groups, with a ST4-strand graft. Various intraoperative parameters were studied like the time of the tourniquet, the diameter of the graft or an associated meniscus tear. The AP knee laxity was evaluated at 6 months and 1 year after the surgery by a TELOS test. We also compared the two groups with subjective and objective surveys. We can conclude that the suspensory device can offer the same strengthening.

Acta Orthopaedica BelgicaVol. 90(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.