Low dislocation rate following revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) with dual mobility cup with minimum 2-year follow-up

Dislocation is the second most common indication for revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). In revision cases the dislocation rate can be as high as 5-30%. The aim of this study was to assess the outcome, specifically the dislocation rate in revision THA where a dual mobility cup was used. We retrospectively reviewed all the revision THAs where a dual mobility cup (G7) was used. The pre-operative and post-operative oxford hip scores were recorded. Patients' electronic records and radiographs were studied for the indications, approaches used, post-operative complications, re-operation rates, and re-revision surgery. Between 2016 and 2020, we performed 59 revision total hip replacements where a dual mobility cup (G7) was used. There were 23 males and 36 females. The average age was 74 years (range, 64-89). Acetabular components were revised in 47 (80%) cases and both the femoral and the acetabular components were revised in 12 (20%) cases. The average follow-up time was 4 years (range, 2-6 years). Average pre-operative and post-operative oxford hip scores were 17 and 36 respectively. The improvement was significant with P value of <.001. Complications were noted in 5 (8%) patients. One patient had dislocation. This patient required re-revision with constrained liner. One patient had intraoperative fracture of the femur and was treated with plate and cables. We conclude that the dual mobility cup can significantly reduce the risk of dislocation when used in revision THA.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Orthopaedica Belgica
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52628/90.4.12752
Primary Topic
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Low dislocation rate following revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) with dual mobility cup with minimum 2-year follow-up

Ashwin Shetty, Shah Jehan, Simon Jones, A. Ng
Acta Orthopaedica Belgica
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
article

Low dislocation rate following revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) with dual mobility cup with minimum 2-year follow-up

Ashwin Shetty, Shah Jehan, Simon Jones, A. Ng
article en

Abstract

Dislocation is the second most common indication for revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). In revision cases the dislocation rate can be as high as 5-30%. The aim of this study was to assess the outcome, specifically the dislocation rate in revision THA where a dual mobility cup was used. We retrospectively reviewed all the revision THAs where a dual mobility cup (G7) was used. The pre-operative and post-operative oxford hip scores were recorded. Patients' electronic records and radiographs were studied for the indications, approaches used, post-operative complications, re-operation rates, and re-revision surgery. Between 2016 and 2020, we performed 59 revision total hip replacements where a dual mobility cup (G7) was used. There were 23 males and 36 females. The average age was 74 years (range, 64-89). Acetabular components were revised in 47 (80%) cases and both the femoral and the acetabular components were revised in 12 (20%) cases. The average follow-up time was 4 years (range, 2-6 years). Average pre-operative and post-operative oxford hip scores were 17 and 36 respectively. The improvement was significant with P value of <.001. Complications were noted in 5 (8%) patients. One patient had dislocation. This patient required re-revision with constrained liner. One patient had intraoperative fracture of the femur and was treated with plate and cables. We conclude that the dual mobility cup can significantly reduce the risk of dislocation when used in revision THA.

Acta Orthopaedica BelgicaVol. 90(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.