Hierarchies of knowers and knowledges: exploring the potential of academic practitioner collaborations in tackling knowledge inequalities

In this article, we examine why academics and practitioners researching inequalities choose to collaborate and to what extent such collaborations have the potential to address knowledge inequalities in the research process. We maintain that the mere act of collaboration does not inherently lead to the tackling of knowledge inequalities and that the motivations for collaboration matter. We argue that although in single collaborations partners can create equitable relationships where the knowledge of both academic and practitioner partners are valued, transforming the dominant epistemological hierarchies within academia and policymaking will require time and structural change. We end by considering how such change will be difficult to achieve but is not impossible.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Social Research Methodology
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2025.2455967
Primary Topic
Global Educational Policies and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hierarchies of knowers and knowledges: exploring the potential of academic practitioner collaborations in tackling knowledge inequalities

Aygen Kurt, Tahnee Ooms, Armine Ishkanian, Barbara Jantien van Paassen et al.
International Journal of Social Research Methodology
Global Educational Policies and Reforms
article

Hierarchies of knowers and knowledges: exploring the potential of academic practitioner collaborations in tackling knowledge inequalities

Aygen Kurt, Tahnee Ooms, Armine Ishkanian, Barbara Jantien van Paassen, Ishita Puri, Branwen Spector
article en

Abstract

In this article, we examine why academics and practitioners researching inequalities choose to collaborate and to what extent such collaborations have the potential to address knowledge inequalities in the research process. We maintain that the mere act of collaboration does not inherently lead to the tackling of knowledge inequalities and that the motivations for collaboration matter. We argue that although in single collaborations partners can create equitable relationships where the knowledge of both academic and practitioner partners are valued, transforming the dominant epistemological hierarchies within academia and policymaking will require time and structural change. We end by considering how such change will be difficult to achieve but is not impossible.

International Journal of Social Research MethodologyVol. 29(1)
Institute for International Social Research (DE), University College London (GB), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Global Educational Policies and Reforms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Hierarchies of knowers and knowledges: exploring the potential of academic practitioner collaborations in tackling knowledge inequalities — Aygen Kurt, Tahnee Ooms, et al. · International Journal of Social Research Methodology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS