Being-in-the-world and Life

This article explores the philosophical dialogue and intersections between two prominent 20th-century thinkers: José Ortega y Gasset and Martin Heidegger. Despite their different cultural and linguistic contexts, their reflections converge on questions of human existence and engagement with the world. The study examines their central concepts, such as Heidegger’s “being-in-the-world” and Ortega’s “ideas and beliefs,” providing an in-depth look at how humans interpret and inhabit reality. The analysis highlights both differences and parallels in their approaches to examining the world and human existence. While Heidegger employs a terminology rich in philosophical neologisms, his analysis of Dasein and care (Sorge) resonates with Ortega’s concept of the “radical reality” of life. Conversely, Ortega emphasizes the necessity of engaging a broad audience and stresses the role of human imagination in constructing the world. The article also investigates the importance of cognition as a mode of “being-in-the-world” for both philosophers. Despite methodological differences, both thinkers conclude that the human being and the world they inhabit are inseparably linked. This work deepens the understanding of philosophical resonances between two intellectual traditions and offers new directions for further study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy Journal of the Higher School of Economics
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17323/2587-8719-2024-4-168-181
Primary Topic
Spanish Philosophy and Literature
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Being-in-the-world and Life

Роман Алексеевич Устьянцев
Philosophy Journal of the Higher School of Economics
Spanish Philosophy and Literature
article

Being-in-the-world and Life

Роман Алексеевич Устьянцев
article en

Abstract

This article explores the philosophical dialogue and intersections between two prominent 20th-century thinkers: José Ortega y Gasset and Martin Heidegger. Despite their different cultural and linguistic contexts, their reflections converge on questions of human existence and engagement with the world. The study examines their central concepts, such as Heidegger’s “being-in-the-world” and Ortega’s “ideas and beliefs,” providing an in-depth look at how humans interpret and inhabit reality. The analysis highlights both differences and parallels in their approaches to examining the world and human existence. While Heidegger employs a terminology rich in philosophical neologisms, his analysis of Dasein and care (Sorge) resonates with Ortega’s concept of the “radical reality” of life. Conversely, Ortega emphasizes the necessity of engaging a broad audience and stresses the role of human imagination in constructing the world. The article also investigates the importance of cognition as a mode of “being-in-the-world” for both philosophers. Despite methodological differences, both thinkers conclude that the human being and the world they inhabit are inseparably linked. This work deepens the understanding of philosophical resonances between two intellectual traditions and offers new directions for further study.

Philosophy Journal of the Higher School of EconomicsVol. 8(4)
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES), National Research Council (LK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Spanish Philosophy and Literature
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.