Research Ethics and Methods in Shifting Policy Climates: The Case of Abortion Rights in the United States and Latin America
We have spent the last two years conducting fieldwork on abortion rights movements in the United States and Latin America, building from our previous work on abortion policies, movements, organizations, and activists across the Americas (Beisel and Kay 2004; Calasanti 2015; Calasanti, Kay, and Ostermann 2023; Fernández Anderson 2017, 2020, 2022; Ruibal and Fernández Anderson 2018). In the wake of the 2022 US Supreme Court decision Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization , we have noted a palpable shift in the dynamics between organizations, new challenges in establishing contacts, and a heightened need to safeguard participants’ identity. While the ramifications of Dobbs have been felt most keenly in the US, there have been reverberations through the connections between movements across the Americas. We find organizations in the US to be inextricably linked with and informed by networks originating in Latin America. Indeed, much of our present approach to research in the US has been informed by our knowledge and experience researching abortion rights movements outside of the US.
Authors
- Cora Fernández Anderson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9521-6669)
- Anna Calasanti (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1148-4197)
- Tamara Kay (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6414-6928)
Institutions
- University of Notre Dame (US)
- Mount Holyoke College (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Politics & Gender
- Published
- 2024-12-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s1743923x24000230
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Reproductive Health and Contraception
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.54