Research Ethics and Methods in Shifting Policy Climates: The Case of Abortion Rights in the United States and Latin America

We have spent the last two years conducting fieldwork on abortion rights movements in the United States and Latin America, building from our previous work on abortion policies, movements, organizations, and activists across the Americas (Beisel and Kay 2004; Calasanti 2015; Calasanti, Kay, and Ostermann 2023; Fernández Anderson 2017, 2020, 2022; Ruibal and Fernández Anderson 2018). In the wake of the 2022 US Supreme Court decision Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization , we have noted a palpable shift in the dynamics between organizations, new challenges in establishing contacts, and a heightened need to safeguard participants’ identity. While the ramifications of Dobbs have been felt most keenly in the US, there have been reverberations through the connections between movements across the Americas. We find organizations in the US to be inextricably linked with and informed by networks originating in Latin America. Indeed, much of our present approach to research in the US has been informed by our knowledge and experience researching abortion rights movements outside of the US.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Politics & Gender
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1743923x24000230
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Contraception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research Ethics and Methods in Shifting Policy Climates: The Case of Abortion Rights in the United States and Latin America

Cora Fernández Anderson, Anna Calasanti, Tamara Kay
1 citations
Politics & Gender
Reproductive Health and Contraception
0.54
article

Research Ethics and Methods in Shifting Policy Climates: The Case of Abortion Rights in the United States and Latin America

Cora Fernández Anderson, Anna Calasanti, Tamara Kay
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We have spent the last two years conducting fieldwork on abortion rights movements in the United States and Latin America, building from our previous work on abortion policies, movements, organizations, and activists across the Americas (Beisel and Kay 2004; Calasanti 2015; Calasanti, Kay, and Ostermann 2023; Fernández Anderson 2017, 2020, 2022; Ruibal and Fernández Anderson 2018). In the wake of the 2022 US Supreme Court decision Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization , we have noted a palpable shift in the dynamics between organizations, new challenges in establishing contacts, and a heightened need to safeguard participants’ identity. While the ramifications of Dobbs have been felt most keenly in the US, there have been reverberations through the connections between movements across the Americas. We find organizations in the US to be inextricably linked with and informed by networks originating in Latin America. Indeed, much of our present approach to research in the US has been informed by our knowledge and experience researching abortion rights movements outside of the US.

Politics & GenderVol. 20(4)
University of Notre Dame (US), Mount Holyoke College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Reproductive Health and Contraception
0.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Research Ethics and Methods in Shifting Policy Climates: The Case of Abortion Rights in the United States and Latin America — Cora Fernández Anderson, Anna Calasanti, et al. · Politics & Gender (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS