Income inequality in Mexico, 1895-1940: industrialisation, revolution, institutions

Abstract This paper, building on new archival research and the social table method, presents comprehensive estimates of income inequality in Mexico in 1895, 1910, 1930 and 1940. Inequality grew from 1895 to 1910, driven by economic expansion within the context of an oligarchic economy. While real income increased for the lower classes during this period, the main beneficiaries were large landowners and entrepreneurs. In the revolutionary period from 1910 to 1930 inequality decreased especially as a result of land reforms, benefitting peasants at the expense of the large landowners. However, the economic structure of the country was not fundamentally changed, and in the 1930s inequality raised as incomes of peasants and those in the informal sector fell behind manufacturing and other high-earning sectors. The Mexican case shows the complex interaction of economics, demography and politics in determining economic inequality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Revista de Historia Económica / Journal of Iberian and Latin American Economic History
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s021261092400017x
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Economic Theory and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.83
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Income inequality in Mexico, 1895-1940: industrialisation, revolution, institutions

Diego Castañeda Garza, Erik Bengtsson
2 citations
Revista de Historia Económica / Journal of Iberian and Latin American Economic History
Economic Theory and Policy
0.83
article

Income inequality in Mexico, 1895-1940: industrialisation, revolution, institutions

Diego Castañeda Garza, Erik Bengtsson
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract This paper, building on new archival research and the social table method, presents comprehensive estimates of income inequality in Mexico in 1895, 1910, 1930 and 1940. Inequality grew from 1895 to 1910, driven by economic expansion within the context of an oligarchic economy. While real income increased for the lower classes during this period, the main beneficiaries were large landowners and entrepreneurs. In the revolutionary period from 1910 to 1930 inequality decreased especially as a result of land reforms, benefitting peasants at the expense of the large landowners. However, the economic structure of the country was not fundamentally changed, and in the 1930s inequality raised as incomes of peasants and those in the informal sector fell behind manufacturing and other high-earning sectors. The Mexican case shows the complex interaction of economics, demography and politics in determining economic inequality.

Revista de Historia Económica / Journal of Iberian and Latin American Economic HistoryVol. 42(3)
Uppsala University (SE), Lund University (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Economic Theory and Policy
0.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Income inequality in Mexico, 1895-1940: industrialisation, revolution, institutions — Diego Castañeda Garza, Erik Bengtsson · Revista de Historia Económica / Journal of Iberian and Latin American Economic History (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS