BİRLEŞMİŞ MİLLETLER GÜVENLİK KONSEYİNİN ULUSLARARASI HUKUKU UYGULAMADAKİ BAŞARISIZLIĞININ MÜSLÜMAN DÜNYASINDA ŞİDDET VE KAOSA KATKISI: YEMEN'E (2015- ) VE GAZZE'YE (2023- ) YÖNELİK SALDIRI SAVAŞLARI

This paper draws on the perverse use of international law by hegemonic powers on the subject of the use of force in international relations. In order to expose the distortive interpretation and implementation, by major powers, of the UN Charter and other instruments and sources of international law, this study draws on two cases of the wars of aggression targeting Yemen and Gaza respectively. The failure of the UN Security Council to take punitive action against the Saudi-led coalition forces and Israel, as the two perpetrators of crimes of aggression against the victimises peoples, in order to end hostilities, has been a tragic testimony to the endurance of the colonial and asymmetrical roots of existing rules and principles of international law. The two cases and the dominant narrative surrounding them which has tended towards blaming the victims also point to the complicity between the centres of political power and the predominant media.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
DergiPark (Istanbul University)
Published
2024-09-14
Primary Topic
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

BİRLEŞMİŞ MİLLETLER GÜVENLİK KONSEYİNİN ULUSLARARASI HUKUKU UYGULAMADAKİ BAŞARISIZLIĞININ MÜSLÜMAN DÜNYASINDA ŞİDDET VE KAOSA KATKISI: YEMEN'E (2015- ) VE GAZZE'YE (2023- ) YÖNELİK SALDIRI SAVAŞLARI

Berdal Aral
DergiPark (Istanbul University)
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
article

BİRLEŞMİŞ MİLLETLER GÜVENLİK KONSEYİNİN ULUSLARARASI HUKUKU UYGULAMADAKİ BAŞARISIZLIĞININ MÜSLÜMAN DÜNYASINDA ŞİDDET VE KAOSA KATKISI: YEMEN'E (2015- ) VE GAZZE'YE (2023- ) YÖNELİK SALDIRI SAVAŞLARI

Berdal Aral
article en

Abstract

This paper draws on the perverse use of international law by hegemonic powers on the subject of the use of force in international relations. In order to expose the distortive interpretation and implementation, by major powers, of the UN Charter and other instruments and sources of international law, this study draws on two cases of the wars of aggression targeting Yemen and Gaza respectively. The failure of the UN Security Council to take punitive action against the Saudi-led coalition forces and Israel, as the two perpetrators of crimes of aggression against the victimises peoples, in order to end hostilities, has been a tragic testimony to the endurance of the colonial and asymmetrical roots of existing rules and principles of international law. The two cases and the dominant narrative surrounding them which has tended towards blaming the victims also point to the complicity between the centres of political power and the predominant media.

DergiPark (Istanbul University)
Istanbul Medeniyet University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.