Efficacy of a Clinical Decision Support Tool to Promote Guideline-Concordant Evaluations in Patients With High-Risk Microscopic Hematuria: A Cluster Randomized Quality Improvement Project

Implementing an electronic health record-integrated CDS tool to promote evaluation of patients with high-risk MH did not lead to improvements in patient completion of a full guideline-concordant evaluation. The development of an algorithm to trigger a CDS alert was demonstrated to be feasible and effective. Further multilevel assessment of barriers to evaluation is necessary to continue to improve the approach to evaluating high-risk patients with MH.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Urology
Published
2025-02-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/ju.0000000000004436
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Urinary Tract Infections Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy of a Clinical Decision Support Tool to Promote Guideline-Concordant Evaluations in Patients With High-Risk Microscopic Hematuria: A Cluster Randomized Quality Improvement Project

Adam Szerencsy, Richard S. Matulewicz, Danil V. Makarov, Isaac Dapkins et al.
1 citations
The Journal of Urology
Urinary Tract Infections Management
1.35
article

Efficacy of a Clinical Decision Support Tool to Promote Guideline-Concordant Evaluations in Patients With High-Risk Microscopic Hematuria: A Cluster Randomized Quality Improvement Project

Adam Szerencsy, Richard S. Matulewicz, Danil V. Makarov, Isaac Dapkins, Arielle R. Nagler, William C. King, Christina Wong, Zachary S. Feuer, Saul Blecker, Sarah Tsuruo, Leora I. Horwitz
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Implementing an electronic health record-integrated CDS tool to promote evaluation of patients with high-risk MH did not lead to improvements in patient completion of a full guideline-concordant evaluation. The development of an algorithm to trigger a CDS alert was demonstrated to be feasible and effective. Further multilevel assessment of barriers to evaluation is necessary to continue to improve the approach to evaluating high-risk patients with MH.

The Journal of UrologyVol. 213(5)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), NYU Langone Health (US), Lutheran Family Health Centers (US), New York University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Urinary Tract Infections Management
1.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Efficacy of a Clinical Decision Support Tool to Promote Guideline-Concordant Evaluations in Patients With High-Risk Microscopic Hematuria: A Cluster Randomized Quality Improvement Project — Adam Szerencsy, Richard S. Matulewicz, et al. · The Journal of Urology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS