Watch Your Language: A Corpus Linguistics Analysis and Systematic Review of Feedback

The purpose of this systematic review of literature was to examine the language surrounding a primary role associated with supervision: feedback. Feedback is powerful and foundational to the on-going professional and personal development of teacher candidates, yet the meaning of the word on its own is taken-for-granted, undefined, and often left to the reader to make their own interpretation. This review is guided by the theoretical tool of corpus linguistics analysis to understand the relationship of words associated with feedback in the context of literature, which provides clarity on the possible representations and meanings of feedback. Clarity of language leads to clarity of research methods, findings, and future direction for practitioners. The existing use of the word feedback reveals more about the agency of those involved with the phenomenon, as well as the implications of this viewpoint. Based on the findings of this review, recommendations and implications for future research and practice involving supervision, and feedback are made to strengthen and unify the field around the subtle, yet impactful use of the word feedback in terms of information, process, or event.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Agricultural Education
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.v65i4.2790
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Watch Your Language: A Corpus Linguistics Analysis and Systematic Review of Feedback

Amy R. Smith, Kirby Schmidt, Josh Stewart
Journal of Agricultural Education
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
article

Watch Your Language: A Corpus Linguistics Analysis and Systematic Review of Feedback

Amy R. Smith, Kirby Schmidt, Josh Stewart
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this systematic review of literature was to examine the language surrounding a primary role associated with supervision: feedback. Feedback is powerful and foundational to the on-going professional and personal development of teacher candidates, yet the meaning of the word on its own is taken-for-granted, undefined, and often left to the reader to make their own interpretation. This review is guided by the theoretical tool of corpus linguistics analysis to understand the relationship of words associated with feedback in the context of literature, which provides clarity on the possible representations and meanings of feedback. Clarity of language leads to clarity of research methods, findings, and future direction for practitioners. The existing use of the word feedback reveals more about the agency of those involved with the phenomenon, as well as the implications of this viewpoint. Based on the findings of this review, recommendations and implications for future research and practice involving supervision, and feedback are made to strengthen and unify the field around the subtle, yet impactful use of the word feedback in terms of information, process, or event.

Journal of Agricultural EducationVol. 65(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Watch Your Language: A Corpus Linguistics Analysis and Systematic Review of Feedback — Amy R. Smith, Kirby Schmidt, et al. · Journal of Agricultural Education (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS