ṢULḤ BEHTAR AST [PEACE IS BETTER]. By Mohammad RezaKazempur. Tehran, Iran: Nashr Motakhassesan, 2024. Pp. 100. Paper, 820,000 IRR.

pointing out that opposition to mainstream thought can later be flipped and viewed positively.Michaelson's use of queer theory and his philological and textual analysis advances scholarship on Frank, Sabbateanism, and Jewish mysticism more broadly.However, one walks away from this book with many more questions than answers.Was Frank a true believer, a charlatan, or a nihilist?How did he relate to his followers and vice versa?Is there a logic to ZSP, and if so, how did it reflect its author and, in turn, its audience?Michaelson's systematic appendix on ZSP and the state of relevant scholarship indicates there is a way to navigate these questions and so much more, but he seems to prefer to leave Frank as an idea reflecting the seismic shift in European Jewish thought and society between then and now.Of course, as the book's title indicates, Michaelson set out to elucidate the idea of Frank's heresy, not Frank himself or the totality and evolution of his thought.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Religious Studies Review
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/rsr.17536
Primary Topic
Islamic Studies and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ṢULḤ BEHTAR AST [PEACE IS BETTER]. By Mohammad RezaKazempur. Tehran, Iran: Nashr Motakhassesan, 2024. Pp. 100. Paper, 820,000 IRR.

Hossein Baqeri
Religious Studies Review
Islamic Studies and History
article

ṢULḤ BEHTAR AST [PEACE IS BETTER]. By Mohammad RezaKazempur. Tehran, Iran: Nashr Motakhassesan, 2024. Pp. 100. Paper, 820,000 IRR.

Hossein Baqeri
article en

Abstract

pointing out that opposition to mainstream thought can later be flipped and viewed positively.Michaelson's use of queer theory and his philological and textual analysis advances scholarship on Frank, Sabbateanism, and Jewish mysticism more broadly.However, one walks away from this book with many more questions than answers.Was Frank a true believer, a charlatan, or a nihilist?How did he relate to his followers and vice versa?Is there a logic to ZSP, and if so, how did it reflect its author and, in turn, its audience?Michaelson's systematic appendix on ZSP and the state of relevant scholarship indicates there is a way to navigate these questions and so much more, but he seems to prefer to leave Frank as an idea reflecting the seismic shift in European Jewish thought and society between then and now.Of course, as the book's title indicates, Michaelson set out to elucidate the idea of Frank's heresy, not Frank himself or the totality and evolution of his thought.

Religious Studies ReviewVol. 50(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Islamic Studies and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.