Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Computing Science: Culture is the Key, Curriculum Contributes

Undergraduate computer science programs worldwide struggle to attract and retain underrepresented students for many reasons. Culture, stereotype threats, uneven gender and racial representations, lack of role models, and uncertain career prospects for minority groups are among the many reasons behind this situation. Many computer science programs are trying to change course through strategies to foster equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI), aimed at improving outreach, recruitment, admissions, and retention of underrepresented students. EDI approaches may also include modifications to the undergraduate computer science curriculum. However, if not properly planned, these modifications risk amplifying existing stereotypes rather than producing positive change [38]. In this study, through an extensive literature review, a rigorous curriculum analysis of 49 computer science programs across the globe, and qualitative and quantitative analysis of surveys and interviews bringing in the voices of 613 students and 30 educators participating from around the world, we explore equity, diversity, and inclusion in the computer science curriculum. We highlight the role of inclusive content and course design, discuss program flexibility, and the impact of inclusive courses and program design in attracting and retaining historically marginalized students. Finally, we provide concrete steps to make computing science undergraduate curricula more appealing to a diverse audience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3689187.3709611
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Teaching and Learning Programming
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.77

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Computing Science: Culture is the Key, Curriculum Contributes

Richard Wicentowski, Fiona McNeill, Ouldooz Baghban Karimi, Alice L. L. Gao et al.
4 citations
Teaching and Learning Programming
6.77
article

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Computing Science: Culture is the Key, Curriculum Contributes

Richard Wicentowski, Fiona McNeill, Ouldooz Baghban Karimi, Alice L. L. Gao, Peggy Lindner, Rebecca Robinson, Giulia Toti, Shanon Reckinger, Jinyoung Hur, Anna Sollazzo, Rutwa Engineer
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Undergraduate computer science programs worldwide struggle to attract and retain underrepresented students for many reasons. Culture, stereotype threats, uneven gender and racial representations, lack of role models, and uncertain career prospects for minority groups are among the many reasons behind this situation. Many computer science programs are trying to change course through strategies to foster equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI), aimed at improving outreach, recruitment, admissions, and retention of underrepresented students. EDI approaches may also include modifications to the undergraduate computer science curriculum. However, if not properly planned, these modifications risk amplifying existing stereotypes rather than producing positive change [38]. In this study, through an extensive literature review, a rigorous curriculum analysis of 49 computer science programs across the globe, and qualitative and quantitative analysis of surveys and interviews bringing in the voices of 613 students and 30 educators participating from around the world, we explore equity, diversity, and inclusion in the computer science curriculum. We highlight the role of inclusive content and course design, discuss program flexibility, and the impact of inclusive courses and program design in attracting and retaining historically marginalized students. Finally, we provide concrete steps to make computing science undergraduate curricula more appealing to a diverse audience.

Swarthmore College (US), University of British Columbia (CA), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), Simon Fraser University (CA), University of Toronto (CA), University of Illinois Chicago (US), University of Houston (US), Monash University (AU), University of Glasgow (GB), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Simon Fraser University
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Teaching and Learning Programming
6.77
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.