Cultivating Trust in the Face of Crisis: Science as Moderator in Collaborative Forest Management

Conflict over resources and often-ensuing political gridlock present a profound threat to local communities and to the broader sustainability of ecologies within which they are embedded. The American west has experienced drastic shifts in its approach to forests since the timber industry and environmental movement’s protracted clash dubbed the ‘timber wars.’ In the shadow of conflict and in the face of increasingly devastating fire seasons, collaborative forest management (CFM) offers an arduous but viable path forward. This paper examines a successful case of CFM in Oregon, USA—a partnership of once-feuding enemies that has navigated ecological and political crisis. The case study draws on data collected through rapid-ethnography and in-depth interviews with partnership members and other stakeholders. The study unpacks the science-led governance model and collaborative culture that has resulted in the restoration of thousands of acres of forest, advanced scientific understanding, and supported job growth in rural communities. The paper argues the importance of meso-level governance systems that build civic and scientific capacity to address shifting conditions, and crises, into the future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SocietàMutamentoPolitica
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36253/smp-15784
Primary Topic
Forest Management and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cultivating Trust in the Face of Crisis: Science as Moderator in Collaborative Forest Management

Emily B. Campbell
SocietàMutamentoPolitica
Forest Management and Policy
article

Cultivating Trust in the Face of Crisis: Science as Moderator in Collaborative Forest Management

Emily B. Campbell
article en

Abstract

Conflict over resources and often-ensuing political gridlock present a profound threat to local communities and to the broader sustainability of ecologies within which they are embedded. The American west has experienced drastic shifts in its approach to forests since the timber industry and environmental movement’s protracted clash dubbed the ‘timber wars.’ In the shadow of conflict and in the face of increasingly devastating fire seasons, collaborative forest management (CFM) offers an arduous but viable path forward. This paper examines a successful case of CFM in Oregon, USA—a partnership of once-feuding enemies that has navigated ecological and political crisis. The case study draws on data collected through rapid-ethnography and in-depth interviews with partnership members and other stakeholders. The study unpacks the science-led governance model and collaborative culture that has resulted in the restoration of thousands of acres of forest, advanced scientific understanding, and supported job growth in rural communities. The paper argues the importance of meso-level governance systems that build civic and scientific capacity to address shifting conditions, and crises, into the future.

SocietàMutamentoPoliticaVol. 15(30)
Rhode Island College (US)
Lumina Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Forest Management and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.