A CASE STUDY ON RISK MANAGEMENT SYSTEM OF A RURAL COOPERATIVE BANK IN INDIA

Rural Cooperative Banks (RCBs) are supervised by National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD) under CAMELSC rating framework. The CAMELSC model is principally performance-oriented while risk factors are not effectively incorporated. NABARD’s Enhanced CAMELSC model, which will be fully implemented by the end of FY26, includes additional risk and control indicators. The purpose of this study is to examine liquidity risk, interest rate risk and credit risk of a District Cooperative Central Bank (DCCB) having good financial position as per the C, A, E and L components of CAMELSC model. Name and data of the bank have been partially modified to maintain confidentiality of the data not available in public domain. The study is based on policies, committee proceedings and quantitative data obtained from a DCCB, discussion with bank officials, and periodic returns submitted to NABARD. The study employed various guidelines by RBI and NABARD. The stock and flow approaches suggested that the bank had moderate liquidity risk. Application of Interest Rate Sensitivity Statements, Macaulay Duration of investment portfolio, and MCLR methodology for interest rate benchmarking showed low interest rate risk. Altman’s z-score model illustrated credit risk in institutional clients viz. PACS and logistic regression model for retail customer scoring indicated limitation in capturing credit risk of its retail customers. The capital adequacy assessment also indicated the bank had insufficient RoA to give dividend as per its mandate. Bank did not have governance mechanism in place such as Credit Risk Management Committee or having effective ALCO to carry out executive functions of monitoring and controlling risk controls/ limits as per the policy.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indian Journal of Finance and Banking
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46281/ijfb.v14i2.2276
Primary Topic
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A CASE STUDY ON RISK MANAGEMENT SYSTEM OF A RURAL COOPERATIVE BANK IN INDIA

Indian Journal of Finance and Banking
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
article

A CASE STUDY ON RISK MANAGEMENT SYSTEM OF A RURAL COOPERATIVE BANK IN INDIA

article en

Abstract

Rural Cooperative Banks (RCBs) are supervised by National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD) under CAMELSC rating framework. The CAMELSC model is principally performance-oriented while risk factors are not effectively incorporated. NABARD’s Enhanced CAMELSC model, which will be fully implemented by the end of FY26, includes additional risk and control indicators. The purpose of this study is to examine liquidity risk, interest rate risk and credit risk of a District Cooperative Central Bank (DCCB) having good financial position as per the C, A, E and L components of CAMELSC model. Name and data of the bank have been partially modified to maintain confidentiality of the data not available in public domain. The study is based on policies, committee proceedings and quantitative data obtained from a DCCB, discussion with bank officials, and periodic returns submitted to NABARD. The study employed various guidelines by RBI and NABARD. The stock and flow approaches suggested that the bank had moderate liquidity risk. Application of Interest Rate Sensitivity Statements, Macaulay Duration of investment portfolio, and MCLR methodology for interest rate benchmarking showed low interest rate risk. Altman’s z-score model illustrated credit risk in institutional clients viz. PACS and logistic regression model for retail customer scoring indicated limitation in capturing credit risk of its retail customers. The capital adequacy assessment also indicated the bank had insufficient RoA to give dividend as per its mandate. Bank did not have governance mechanism in place such as Credit Risk Management Committee or having effective ALCO to carry out executive functions of monitoring and controlling risk controls/ limits as per the policy.

Indian Journal of Finance and Banking
National Australia Bank (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.