Detecting Outliers and Using Robust Methods in Linear Panel Data Model

The increasing use of panel data across various fields necessitates robust estimation methods that can resist the influence of outliers, which often lead to biased and ineffective estimates when using traditional methods like least squares. This research investigates two robust estimation techniques within fixed and random effects models for panel data, comparing their performance using the mean square error. Through a simulation experiment with varying sample sizes and contamination levels, the results for the fixed effects model indicate that the Weighted Likelihood Estimator consistently outperformed other methods across all sample sizes at a 10% contamination rate, while the S method excelled at a 20% contamination rate. For the random effects model, the former was most effective with a sample size of 200, while the latter proved superior at a sample size of 800, regardless of contamination levels.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Al-Nahrain Journal of Science
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22401/anjs.27.4.07
Primary Topic
Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Detecting Outliers and Using Robust Methods in Linear Panel Data Model

Haneen Namah Jaseem, Lekaa Ali Mohammad
Al-Nahrain Journal of Science
Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
article

Detecting Outliers and Using Robust Methods in Linear Panel Data Model

Haneen Namah Jaseem, Lekaa Ali Mohammad
article en

Abstract

The increasing use of panel data across various fields necessitates robust estimation methods that can resist the influence of outliers, which often lead to biased and ineffective estimates when using traditional methods like least squares. This research investigates two robust estimation techniques within fixed and random effects models for panel data, comparing their performance using the mean square error. Through a simulation experiment with varying sample sizes and contamination levels, the results for the fixed effects model indicate that the Weighted Likelihood Estimator consistently outperformed other methods across all sample sizes at a 10% contamination rate, while the S method excelled at a 20% contamination rate. For the random effects model, the former was most effective with a sample size of 200, while the latter proved superior at a sample size of 800, regardless of contamination levels.

Al-Nahrain Journal of ScienceVol. 27(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.