Spinal anesthesia as a method of anesthetic support for arthroscopic cruciate ligament reconstruction: a single-center prospective cohort study

Background: The annually increasing number of arthroscopic interventions on cruciate ligaments, especially in outpatient settings, necessitates identifying the most rational methods of anesthetic support for such procedures. Aim: To evaluate spinal anesthesia (SA) as the method of choice for anesthetic support in arthroscopic cruciate ligament reconstruction. Materials and methods: This single-center prospective cohort study included 52 patients who underwent arthroscopic cruciate ligament reconstruction under SA. Postoperative outcomes were assessed by measuring pain intensity at rest and during movement at 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 hours postoperatively using the visual analog scale (VAS). The need for opioid analgesics, their total dose, time to the first analgesic request, motor block recovery time (Bromage scale to Bromage-1), and time to first ambulation were recorded. Intraoperative hemodynamic and pulse oximetry parameters, SA performance time, duration of anesthesia and surgery, total dose of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) during hospitalization, complications, adverse anesthesia reactions, and hospital stay duration were also evaluated. Additionally, patient satisfaction with anesthesia and postoperative pain management quality was assessed. Results: Significant differences in pain levels at rest and during mobilization were observed (p 0.001, R=0.8). A total of 82.6% (n=43) of patients required opioid analgesics postoperatively, with 18% (n=8) needing administration twice or more. The frequency of opioid use was directly proportional to pain severity (p 0.001, R=0.7). The first request for analgesics occurred, on average, at 178 minutes, with motor block recovery at 134 minutes. First ambulation was recorded, on average, more than 3 hours after surgery. Conclusion: Severe postoperative pain, the inability to achieve early mobilization, adverse anesthesia effects, and the transition of arthroscopic procedures to “day surgery” status emphasize the need for alternative anesthesia techniques that overcome SA shortcomings and provide prolonged postoperative pain relief.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Management
Published
2024-12-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17816/ra634534
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spinal anesthesia as a method of anesthetic support for arthroscopic cruciate ligament reconstruction: a single-center prospective cohort study

О. В. Игнатенко, Andrey V. Babayants, Danil V. Gorelov, А. М. Овечкин
Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Management
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Spinal anesthesia as a method of anesthetic support for arthroscopic cruciate ligament reconstruction: a single-center prospective cohort study

О. В. Игнатенко, Andrey V. Babayants, Danil V. Gorelov, А. М. Овечкин
article en

Abstract

Background: The annually increasing number of arthroscopic interventions on cruciate ligaments, especially in outpatient settings, necessitates identifying the most rational methods of anesthetic support for such procedures. Aim: To evaluate spinal anesthesia (SA) as the method of choice for anesthetic support in arthroscopic cruciate ligament reconstruction. Materials and methods: This single-center prospective cohort study included 52 patients who underwent arthroscopic cruciate ligament reconstruction under SA. Postoperative outcomes were assessed by measuring pain intensity at rest and during movement at 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 hours postoperatively using the visual analog scale (VAS). The need for opioid analgesics, their total dose, time to the first analgesic request, motor block recovery time (Bromage scale to Bromage-1), and time to first ambulation were recorded. Intraoperative hemodynamic and pulse oximetry parameters, SA performance time, duration of anesthesia and surgery, total dose of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) during hospitalization, complications, adverse anesthesia reactions, and hospital stay duration were also evaluated. Additionally, patient satisfaction with anesthesia and postoperative pain management quality was assessed. Results: Significant differences in pain levels at rest and during mobilization were observed (p 0.001, R=0.8). A total of 82.6% (n=43) of patients required opioid analgesics postoperatively, with 18% (n=8) needing administration twice or more. The frequency of opioid use was directly proportional to pain severity (p 0.001, R=0.7). The first request for analgesics occurred, on average, at 178 minutes, with motor block recovery at 134 minutes. First ambulation was recorded, on average, more than 3 hours after surgery. Conclusion: Severe postoperative pain, the inability to achieve early mobilization, adverse anesthesia effects, and the transition of arthroscopic procedures to “day surgery” status emphasize the need for alternative anesthesia techniques that overcome SA shortcomings and provide prolonged postoperative pain relief.

Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain ManagementVol. 18(4)
Sechenov University (RU), City Clinical Hospital (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.