Citizen science reveals socio-economic influences on solitary bee abundance across multiple scales in a Global South city

Abstract Context Urban ecosystems exhibit complex biodiversity patterns influenced by both socio-economic and ecological factors. While the role of ecological factors is widely recognised, the relationships between socio-economic and ecological factors, particularly across various spatial scales and considering both landscape composition and configuration, remains underexplored. This limits our understanding of urban environments as interconnected socio-ecological systems. Objectives We examine the influence of socio-economic and ecological landscape factors on solitary bee abundance, aiming to elucidate the complex socio-ecological dynamics shaping urban biodiversity across multiple scales. Methods Data on solitary bee abundance were gathered through a citizen science campaign, supported by 347 participants from Johannesburg, South Africa. We explored the correlations and interactions between solitary bee abundance, socio-economic status (i.e. annual household income) and landscape composition and configuration (i.e. urban green cover and NDVI, and urban vegetation patch density and cohesion), assessing these relationships at 300 m, 2000 m, and 5000 m scales. Results Annual household income was significantly positively correlated with solitary bee abundance across all spatial scales examined, likely due to increased investment in gardens with diverse floral resources in affluent areas. In contrast, our ecological factors, including both landscape composition and configuration metrics, exhibited negligible effects on solitary bee abundance across all spatial scales. Conclusions The strong positive relationship between annual household income and bee abundance across scales highlights potential disparities in access to biodiversity and ecosystem services within Johannesburg. Our results indicate the presence of environmental injustice in this African city and reflect the need for integrating socio-economic factors into landscape ecology. Policies on urban greening that consider both socio-economic and ecological factors are essential for equitable, sustainable urban ecosystems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Landscape Ecology
Published
2025-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-025-02047-7
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.03
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Citizen science reveals socio-economic influences on solitary bee abundance across multiple scales in a Global South city

Dominic A. W. Henry, Chevonne Reynolds, Natasha Shilubane, Brishan Kalyan et al.
1 citations
Landscape Ecology
Plant and animal studies
3.03
article

Citizen science reveals socio-economic influences on solitary bee abundance across multiple scales in a Global South city

Dominic A. W. Henry, Chevonne Reynolds, Natasha Shilubane, Brishan Kalyan, Paris Pencharz
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Context Urban ecosystems exhibit complex biodiversity patterns influenced by both socio-economic and ecological factors. While the role of ecological factors is widely recognised, the relationships between socio-economic and ecological factors, particularly across various spatial scales and considering both landscape composition and configuration, remains underexplored. This limits our understanding of urban environments as interconnected socio-ecological systems. Objectives We examine the influence of socio-economic and ecological landscape factors on solitary bee abundance, aiming to elucidate the complex socio-ecological dynamics shaping urban biodiversity across multiple scales. Methods Data on solitary bee abundance were gathered through a citizen science campaign, supported by 347 participants from Johannesburg, South Africa. We explored the correlations and interactions between solitary bee abundance, socio-economic status (i.e. annual household income) and landscape composition and configuration (i.e. urban green cover and NDVI, and urban vegetation patch density and cohesion), assessing these relationships at 300 m, 2000 m, and 5000 m scales. Results Annual household income was significantly positively correlated with solitary bee abundance across all spatial scales examined, likely due to increased investment in gardens with diverse floral resources in affluent areas. In contrast, our ecological factors, including both landscape composition and configuration metrics, exhibited negligible effects on solitary bee abundance across all spatial scales. Conclusions The strong positive relationship between annual household income and bee abundance across scales highlights potential disparities in access to biodiversity and ecosystem services within Johannesburg. Our results indicate the presence of environmental injustice in this African city and reflect the need for integrating socio-economic factors into landscape ecology. Policies on urban greening that consider both socio-economic and ecological factors are essential for equitable, sustainable urban ecosystems.

Landscape EcologyVol. 40(2)
University of Cape Town (ZA), University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Plant and animal studies
3.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.