A LINGUISTIC STUDY OF REFUSAL STRATEGIES USED BY THE UNIVERSITY OF HAILS UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS

The present study examines the refusal strategies used by the students at the University of Hail (UOH). It tackles two main questions related to what refusal strategies, classified by Beebe et al. (1990), Saudi students at the University of Hail (UOH) employ in their refusal responses and their reasons for using the refusal strategies. The current study has used a modified written discourse completion test (DCT). The students are asked to provide written responses to express their refusals to the given situations. The collected data are analyzed according to the content, number of students, and order of formulas employed by Beebe et al. (1990). The findings indicate that Saudi students at the (UOH) use more expressions of excuses/ reasons/ explanations followed by expressions of regrets. In many cases, they avert the use of no in their refusal strategies, except in some cases where it is followed by excuses or explanations. Moreover, this study reveals that Saudi students have three reasons for justifying their refusals indirectly. These reasons are respect, face-saving, and indirect communication.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Advanced Research
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21474/ijar01/20133
Primary Topic
Stuttering Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A LINGUISTIC STUDY OF REFUSAL STRATEGIES USED BY THE UNIVERSITY OF HAILS UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS

Ibrahim Thaher
International Journal of Advanced Research
Stuttering Research and Treatment
article

A LINGUISTIC STUDY OF REFUSAL STRATEGIES USED BY THE UNIVERSITY OF HAILS UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS

Ibrahim Thaher
article en

Abstract

The present study examines the refusal strategies used by the students at the University of Hail (UOH). It tackles two main questions related to what refusal strategies, classified by Beebe et al. (1990), Saudi students at the University of Hail (UOH) employ in their refusal responses and their reasons for using the refusal strategies. The current study has used a modified written discourse completion test (DCT). The students are asked to provide written responses to express their refusals to the given situations. The collected data are analyzed according to the content, number of students, and order of formulas employed by Beebe et al. (1990). The findings indicate that Saudi students at the (UOH) use more expressions of excuses/ reasons/ explanations followed by expressions of regrets. In many cases, they avert the use of no in their refusal strategies, except in some cases where it is followed by excuses or explanations. Moreover, this study reveals that Saudi students have three reasons for justifying their refusals indirectly. These reasons are respect, face-saving, and indirect communication.

International Journal of Advanced ResearchVol. 12(12)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Stuttering Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A LINGUISTIC STUDY OF REFUSAL STRATEGIES USED BY THE UNIVERSITY OF HAILS UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS — Ibrahim Thaher · International Journal of Advanced Research (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS