Experiences with low-intervention clinical trials—the new category under the European Union Clinical Trials Regulation

Background/AimsLow-intervention clinical trials have been established under the European Union Clinical Trials Regulation (EU 536/2014) which aims to simplify the conduct of clinical trials with authorized medicinal products. There is limited experience with conducting low-intervention trials. Therefore, this study aims to report on experiences and perceived (dis)advantages of low-intervention trials.MethodsWe surveyed representatives of all individual clinical trials registered on the public website of the European Union Clinical Trials Information System between 31 January 2022 and 1 December 2023 that evaluated authorized investigational medicinal products and had at least one investigative site in the European Union. These representatives were approached between June 2023 and January 2024.ResultsWe received 70 responses (response rate 21%). Of the respondents, 31 represented a trial registered as low-intervention trial, and 39 represented a trial not registered as a low-intervention trial (hereafter "regular trials"). Simplified clinical trial monitoring and an easier regulatory approval process were perceived as the main advantages of low-intervention trials, with respectively 44% and 34% of the respondents indicating this to be an advantage in low-intervention trials. However, the respondents experienced that stringent and unclear regulatory requirements impeded the conduct of low-intervention trials. Respondents involved with regular trials indicated that 39% of the regular trials met the criteria of a low-intervention trial but were not registered as such, among others due to unfamiliarity with this trial category.ConclusionsWe argue that the simplified procedures for low-intervention trials should be more detailed-for example in regulatory guidance-in the future to further simplify the conduct of clinical trials with authorized investigational medicinal products.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Trials
Published
2025-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17407745241309293
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.64
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experiences with low-intervention clinical trials—the new category under the European Union Clinical Trials Regulation

Yared Santa‐Ana‐Téllez, Mira G. P. Zuidgeest, Helga Gardarsdóttir, Anthonius de Boer et al.
3 citations
Clinical Trials
Ethics in Clinical Research
5.64
article

Experiences with low-intervention clinical trials—the new category under the European Union Clinical Trials Regulation

Yared Santa‐Ana‐Téllez, Mira G. P. Zuidgeest, Helga Gardarsdóttir, Anthonius de Boer, Amos J. de Jong
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Background/AimsLow-intervention clinical trials have been established under the European Union Clinical Trials Regulation (EU 536/2014) which aims to simplify the conduct of clinical trials with authorized medicinal products. There is limited experience with conducting low-intervention trials. Therefore, this study aims to report on experiences and perceived (dis)advantages of low-intervention trials.MethodsWe surveyed representatives of all individual clinical trials registered on the public website of the European Union Clinical Trials Information System between 31 January 2022 and 1 December 2023 that evaluated authorized investigational medicinal products and had at least one investigative site in the European Union. These representatives were approached between June 2023 and January 2024.ResultsWe received 70 responses (response rate 21%). Of the respondents, 31 represented a trial registered as low-intervention trial, and 39 represented a trial not registered as a low-intervention trial (hereafter "regular trials"). Simplified clinical trial monitoring and an easier regulatory approval process were perceived as the main advantages of low-intervention trials, with respectively 44% and 34% of the respondents indicating this to be an advantage in low-intervention trials. However, the respondents experienced that stringent and unclear regulatory requirements impeded the conduct of low-intervention trials. Respondents involved with regular trials indicated that 39% of the regular trials met the criteria of a low-intervention trial but were not registered as such, among others due to unfamiliarity with this trial category.ConclusionsWe argue that the simplified procedures for low-intervention trials should be more detailed-for example in regulatory guidance-in the future to further simplify the conduct of clinical trials with authorized investigational medicinal products.

Clinical TrialsVol. 22(4)
University of Iceland (IS), Utrecht University (NL), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL), Medicines Evaluation Board (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Ethics in Clinical Research
5.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.