How low can you still go? Observing an ostracized robot is sufficient to hurt humans’ feelings

Ostracism research has shown that even being ostracized by a computer or observing ostracism hurts. Intersecting these two standpoints with human–robot interaction (HRI) research, we conducted three preregistered experiments to investigate observers’ evaluations of vicarious robot ostracism. In Study 1 ( N = 140), people observing an excluded (vs. included) robot in a Cyberball game attributed higher negative emotions and need-threat to the robot, experienced more negative emotions, perceived the humans more negatively, and perceived the human–robot group as less entitative. Study 2 ( N = 172) replicated Study 1 and showed that participants’ responses did not vary for an excluded human or robot. Study 3 ( N = 238) replicated the previous findings using a social media ostracism paradigm and showed that not even the robot’s anthropomorphic features influenced observers’ responses. The research suggests that the ostracism detection system functions even for vicarious robot exclusion and uncovers anthropomorphism, human intragroup, and human–robot intergroup processes unfolding in HRIs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
Published
2025-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302241309578
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.07
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How low can you still go? Observing an ostracized robot is sufficient to hurt humans’ feelings

Manuel Teresi, Stefano Pagliaro, Chiara Ballone, Marco Marinucci et al.
7 citations
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
17.07
article

How low can you still go? Observing an ostracized robot is sufficient to hurt humans’ feelings

Manuel Teresi, Stefano Pagliaro, Chiara Ballone, Marco Marinucci, Paolo Riva
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Ostracism research has shown that even being ostracized by a computer or observing ostracism hurts. Intersecting these two standpoints with human–robot interaction (HRI) research, we conducted three preregistered experiments to investigate observers’ evaluations of vicarious robot ostracism. In Study 1 ( N = 140), people observing an excluded (vs. included) robot in a Cyberball game attributed higher negative emotions and need-threat to the robot, experienced more negative emotions, perceived the humans more negatively, and perceived the human–robot group as less entitative. Study 2 ( N = 172) replicated Study 1 and showed that participants’ responses did not vary for an excluded human or robot. Study 3 ( N = 238) replicated the previous findings using a social media ostracism paradigm and showed that not even the robot’s anthropomorphic features influenced observers’ responses. The research suggests that the ostracism detection system functions even for vicarious robot exclusion and uncovers anthropomorphism, human intragroup, and human–robot intergroup processes unfolding in HRIs.

Group Processes & Intergroup RelationsVol. 28(3)
University of Chieti-Pescara (IT), University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
17.07
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How low can you still go? Observing an ostracized robot is sufficient to hurt humans’ feelings — Manuel Teresi, Stefano Pagliaro, et al. · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS