Deposit return schemes of EU Member States and the EU's internal market

Abstract Deposit return (DR) schemes on drinks containers have long been in place in certain EU Member States. Consumers are charged a deposit per container at the point of purchase, which they can later get back when they return the container after consuming its contents. Whilst such schemes are in the interests of the environment, at least historically before the age of mass‐household recycling, it is debatable whether such schemes can be justified in the modern age, given the obvious problems that DR schemes pose to the EU's internal market as a restriction to cross‐border trade and the free movement of goods. This article analyses DR schemes, accounting for recent developments at the Court of Justice of the European Union, before reflecting on what the future holds for DR schemes as a matter of EU law.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of European Comparative & International Environmental Law
Published
2025-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12591
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Global Financial Crisis and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deposit return schemes of EU Member States and the EU's internal market

Graham Butler
1 citations
Review of European Comparative & International Environmental Law
Global Financial Crisis and Policies
2.21
article

Deposit return schemes of EU Member States and the EU's internal market

Graham Butler
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Deposit return (DR) schemes on drinks containers have long been in place in certain EU Member States. Consumers are charged a deposit per container at the point of purchase, which they can later get back when they return the container after consuming its contents. Whilst such schemes are in the interests of the environment, at least historically before the age of mass‐household recycling, it is debatable whether such schemes can be justified in the modern age, given the obvious problems that DR schemes pose to the EU's internal market as a restriction to cross‐border trade and the free movement of goods. This article analyses DR schemes, accounting for recent developments at the Court of Justice of the European Union, before reflecting on what the future holds for DR schemes as a matter of EU law.

Review of European Comparative & International Environmental LawVol. 34(1)
University of Southern Denmark (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Global Financial Crisis and Policies
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.