Factors influencing risk perceptions of genetically modified seafood: evidence from a specialist population

Most studies of knowledge, attitudes, and risk perceptions related to genetically modified (GM) foods have focused on GM plants. However, there is reason to believe that attitudes toward GM animals might be different and driven by different cognitive and affective factors than plants. With the recent FDA approval of a GM salmon in the United States, there is a need to study what drives attitudes and risk perceptions toward GM biotechnology. Here, we report on a survey of Midwestern US extension personnel’s perceptions of GM salmon. Respondents perceived low risk from GM salmon (2.20 on a 5-point scale). We constructed a model of risk perceptions and found that higher levels of food consciousness were associated with higher levels of risk perceptions. Higher levels of objective knowledge about GM foods were associated with lower risk perceptions. Our results show little evidence that cultural values predict risk perceptions, with weak evidence that hierarchical-individualists may have lower risk perceptions than either egalitarian-communitarians or the broader population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Risk Research
Published
2024-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2024.2437627
Primary Topic
Genetically Modified Organisms Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors influencing risk perceptions of genetically modified seafood: evidence from a specialist population

Amy Shambach, J. Stuart Carlton, Haley Hartenstine
Journal of Risk Research
Genetically Modified Organisms Research
article

Factors influencing risk perceptions of genetically modified seafood: evidence from a specialist population

Amy Shambach, J. Stuart Carlton, Haley Hartenstine
article en

Abstract

Most studies of knowledge, attitudes, and risk perceptions related to genetically modified (GM) foods have focused on GM plants. However, there is reason to believe that attitudes toward GM animals might be different and driven by different cognitive and affective factors than plants. With the recent FDA approval of a GM salmon in the United States, there is a need to study what drives attitudes and risk perceptions toward GM biotechnology. Here, we report on a survey of Midwestern US extension personnel’s perceptions of GM salmon. Respondents perceived low risk from GM salmon (2.20 on a 5-point scale). We constructed a model of risk perceptions and found that higher levels of food consciousness were associated with higher levels of risk perceptions. Higher levels of objective knowledge about GM foods were associated with lower risk perceptions. Our results show little evidence that cultural values predict risk perceptions, with weak evidence that hierarchical-individualists may have lower risk perceptions than either egalitarian-communitarians or the broader population.

Journal of Risk ResearchVol. 27(10)
Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Genetically Modified Organisms Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.