Bridging the gap between science, policy and stakeholders: Towards sustainable wolf–livestock coexistence in human‐dominated landscapes

Abstract While the return of wolves ( Canis lupus ) to many European countries is a conservation milestone, the negative impacts are unevenly distributed across society, placing high pressure on livestock grazing systems. For this perspective, scientists from diverse disciplines and geographical backgrounds reflect on the state of livestock–wolf interactions in Europe and formulate recommendations for enabling wolf–livestock coexistence. We argue that co‐designing, co‐implementing and co‐disseminating research with key stakeholders, such as livestock farmers, is a productive approach to developing and implementing locally appropriate coexistence strategies. Decision‐making should be informed by scientific evidence. We recommend that ecological data on wolves and livestock are collected and shared across borders. Evidence from the social sciences is important for understanding the human dimension of wolf–livestock interactions. We suggest bridging the gaps within multidisciplinary wolf–livestock research to strengthen interdisciplinary insights, comprehensively evaluate management approaches and guide governance and policy decisions that properly account for inherent complexities. Policy implications : As wolf populations and their impacts continue to grow in Europe, policymakers at all levels must make decisions that adequately safeguard wolf populations while simultaneously protecting livestock and livelihoods. This requires access to reliable scientific evidence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
People and Nature
Published
2025-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10786
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bridging the gap between science, policy and stakeholders: Towards sustainable wolf–livestock coexistence in human‐dominated landscapes

Hannah Kirkland, John D. C. Linnell, Hannes König, H.A.H. Jansman et al.
9 citations
People and Nature
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
15.45
article

Bridging the gap between science, policy and stakeholders: Towards sustainable wolf–livestock coexistence in human‐dominated landscapes

Hannah Kirkland, John D. C. Linnell, Hannes König, H.A.H. Jansman, Manuela von Arx, Emu‐Felicitas Ostermann‐Miyashita, Robin Rigg, Ann Eklund, Christian Kiffner, Sandra Uthes, Darragh Hare, Suzanne A. Stone
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Abstract While the return of wolves ( Canis lupus ) to many European countries is a conservation milestone, the negative impacts are unevenly distributed across society, placing high pressure on livestock grazing systems. For this perspective, scientists from diverse disciplines and geographical backgrounds reflect on the state of livestock–wolf interactions in Europe and formulate recommendations for enabling wolf–livestock coexistence. We argue that co‐designing, co‐implementing and co‐disseminating research with key stakeholders, such as livestock farmers, is a productive approach to developing and implementing locally appropriate coexistence strategies. Decision‐making should be informed by scientific evidence. We recommend that ecological data on wolves and livestock are collected and shared across borders. Evidence from the social sciences is important for understanding the human dimension of wolf–livestock interactions. We suggest bridging the gaps within multidisciplinary wolf–livestock research to strengthen interdisciplinary insights, comprehensively evaluate management approaches and guide governance and policy decisions that properly account for inherent complexities. Policy implications : As wolf populations and their impacts continue to grow in Europe, policymakers at all levels must make decisions that adequately safeguard wolf populations while simultaneously protecting livestock and livelihoods. This requires access to reliable scientific evidence.

People and Nature
Cornell University (US), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), University of Oxford (GB), Slovak Caves Administration (SK), Federal Office for Food and Agriculture (DE), Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (DE), University of Inland Norway (NO), Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology (DE), Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NO), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
15.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.