Group Belief: The Cognitive Non-Summative Account

Abstract This article concerns the criteria for when a group can collectively hold a belief. By proposing a cognitive non-summative account of group belief (GB), I highlight three necessary features at the individual level: commonality, mutuality, and group-based considerations. My account asserts that group G believes proposition p if and only if a sufficient majority of its members believe (1) p G , where p G is “Given some G-based considerations, p ,” and (2) “the majority of G also believe that p G .” The article critiques three significant accounts of GB: Anthony Quinton's simple summative account, Margaret Gilbert's and Raimo Tuomela's conative non-summative views, and Jennifer Lackey's modified summativism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dialogue
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0012217324000301
Primary Topic
Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Group Belief: The Cognitive Non-Summative Account

Mohammad Shokri
Dialogue
Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
article

Group Belief: The Cognitive Non-Summative Account

Mohammad Shokri
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article concerns the criteria for when a group can collectively hold a belief. By proposing a cognitive non-summative account of group belief (GB), I highlight three necessary features at the individual level: commonality, mutuality, and group-based considerations. My account asserts that group G believes proposition p if and only if a sufficient majority of its members believe (1) p G , where p G is “Given some G-based considerations, p ,” and (2) “the majority of G also believe that p G .” The article critiques three significant accounts of GB: Anthony Quinton's simple summative account, Margaret Gilbert's and Raimo Tuomela's conative non-summative views, and Jennifer Lackey's modified summativism.

DialogueVol. 63(3)
University of Calgary (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.