Revisiting Response-Dependent Responsibility

Abstract Response-dependence about moral responsibility argues that someone is morally responsible if and only if, and because , they're an appropriate target of reactive attitudes. But if we can be partially morally responsible, and if reactive attitudes are too coarse-grained to register small differences in normatively significant features of agents, then response-dependence is false. Shawn Wang dubs this the “Granularity Challenge.” This article rejects the second premise of the Granularity Challenge. Human emotions are fine-grained enough to register small differences in normatively significant features of agents. One illustrative example of this, I argue, is how children gradually emerge as partially responsible agents.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dialogue
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0012217324000283
Primary Topic
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revisiting Response-Dependent Responsibility

Alexander Carty
Dialogue
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
article

Revisiting Response-Dependent Responsibility

Alexander Carty
article en

Abstract

Abstract Response-dependence about moral responsibility argues that someone is morally responsible if and only if, and because , they're an appropriate target of reactive attitudes. But if we can be partially morally responsible, and if reactive attitudes are too coarse-grained to register small differences in normatively significant features of agents, then response-dependence is false. Shawn Wang dubs this the “Granularity Challenge.” This article rejects the second premise of the Granularity Challenge. Human emotions are fine-grained enough to register small differences in normatively significant features of agents. One illustrative example of this, I argue, is how children gradually emerge as partially responsible agents.

DialogueVol. 63(3)
McGill University (CA)
McGill University, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.