Age Restriction for Job Application from a Human Rights Perspective

Age restriction in applying for a job becomes an essential issue when it causes discriminatory consequences for job seekers, especially if it is caused by the provisions of Article 35 paragraph (1) of Law Number 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower which is considered vague so as to provide a legal loophole for discriminatory actions in providing employment opportunities by employers. The purpose of this study is to examine the vagueness of norms in Article 35 paragraph (1) of the Manpower Law and human rights issues in limiting the age of applying for a job. Examining the problems from the existing laws and doctrines, this research uses normative research methods with the focus of the study is on the norms governing the age restriction of job applications in terms of human rights perspectives and concepts. The results show that the purpose of Article 35 para-graph (1) does not provide an opportunity for discrimination but as a form of flexibility related to determining labor needs. The age limit for applying for a job is not a violation of human rights when viewed from the perspective of the main principles of human rights. The determination of age limit criteria is not specifically regulated and is not prohibited by positive legal provisions in Indonesia so that it cannot be said to be a form of discrimination in providing employment opportunities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Law Politic and Humanities
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i5.768
Primary Topic
Retirement, Disability, and Employment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Age Restriction for Job Application from a Human Rights Perspective

Ni Wayan Ella Apryani
Journal of Law Politic and Humanities
Retirement, Disability, and Employment
article

Age Restriction for Job Application from a Human Rights Perspective

Ni Wayan Ella Apryani
article en

Abstract

Age restriction in applying for a job becomes an essential issue when it causes discriminatory consequences for job seekers, especially if it is caused by the provisions of Article 35 paragraph (1) of Law Number 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower which is considered vague so as to provide a legal loophole for discriminatory actions in providing employment opportunities by employers. The purpose of this study is to examine the vagueness of norms in Article 35 paragraph (1) of the Manpower Law and human rights issues in limiting the age of applying for a job. Examining the problems from the existing laws and doctrines, this research uses normative research methods with the focus of the study is on the norms governing the age restriction of job applications in terms of human rights perspectives and concepts. The results show that the purpose of Article 35 para-graph (1) does not provide an opportunity for discrimination but as a form of flexibility related to determining labor needs. The age limit for applying for a job is not a violation of human rights when viewed from the perspective of the main principles of human rights. The determination of age limit criteria is not specifically regulated and is not prohibited by positive legal provisions in Indonesia so that it cannot be said to be a form of discrimination in providing employment opportunities.

Journal of Law Politic and HumanitiesVol. 4(5)
Udayana University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Retirement, Disability, and Employment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.