Harmonization of International Patient Law in Biotechnology: Strategies For Enhancing Innovation And Global Access

The fragmented global patent landscape poses significant challenges for biotechnology, one of the most innovative sectors of the 21st century. Despite the potential to revolutionize healthcare and agriculture, differences in patent regulation between jurisdictions impede progress, limit equitable access to therapies, and complicate international collaboration. This paper examines the key regulatory frameworks in the United States, the European Union, Japan, and China, focusing on the inherent strengths and challenges of each, by analyzing case studies, such as CRISPR gene editing and CAR-T therapy. The article identifies strategies to deal with ethical dilemmas, intellectual property rights differences, and cross-border enforcement issues. The analysis in this publication encourages harmonization initiatives through regional agreements, international dialogue, and open innovation models to promote global access and sustainable innovation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Law Politic and Humanities
Published
2024-12-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i2.1146
Primary Topic
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Harmonization of International Patient Law in Biotechnology: Strategies For Enhancing Innovation And Global Access

Henry Soelistyo Budi, Raymond R. Tjandrawinata
Journal of Law Politic and Humanities
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
article

Harmonization of International Patient Law in Biotechnology: Strategies For Enhancing Innovation And Global Access

Henry Soelistyo Budi, Raymond R. Tjandrawinata
article en

Abstract

The fragmented global patent landscape poses significant challenges for biotechnology, one of the most innovative sectors of the 21st century. Despite the potential to revolutionize healthcare and agriculture, differences in patent regulation between jurisdictions impede progress, limit equitable access to therapies, and complicate international collaboration. This paper examines the key regulatory frameworks in the United States, the European Union, Japan, and China, focusing on the inherent strengths and challenges of each, by analyzing case studies, such as CRISPR gene editing and CAR-T therapy. The article identifies strategies to deal with ethical dilemmas, intellectual property rights differences, and cross-border enforcement issues. The analysis in this publication encourages harmonization initiatives through regional agreements, international dialogue, and open innovation models to promote global access and sustainable innovation.

Journal of Law Politic and HumanitiesVol. 5(2)
Pelita Harapan University (ID), Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Harmonization of International Patient Law in Biotechnology: Strategies For Enhancing Innovation And Global Access — Henry Soelistyo Budi, Raymond R. Tjandrawinata · Journal of Law Politic and Humanities (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS