The comparative analysis of hybrid purpose companies in the EU: Lessons and policy implications

This study conducts a comparative analysis of hybrid purpose companies in the EU, focusing on Società Benefit in Italy, Sociedades de Beneficio e Interés Común (SBIC) in Spain, and Société à Mission in France. These companies pursue public benefits alongside profit-making, representing an innovative legal framework to address contemporary environmental, social, and economic challenges. The research objectives include systematically evaluating and comparing the legal frameworks with a focus on directors' responsibilities, transparency requirements, and control mechanisms; analysing the organisational perspective of acquiring benefit corporation status; presenting key statistics on growth trends, sectoral distribution, and performance indicators; and comparing mission reports of relevant case studies. Qualitative data analysis was implemented using publicly available secondary data and case study analysis. The results show significant similarities and specific differences between the models, especially in control mechanisms. The Italian model provides stakeholders with public enforcement mechanisms against misleading practices, while the French model relies on mission committees and independent third-party assessments. The Spanish model, introduced in 2022, is expected to develop similar control mechanisms. The growth trends and overall performance indicate that companies recognise the value of adopting this legal framework. The comparative analysis provides valuable insights for EU countries considering introducing similar hybrid-purpose models.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Economics & Sociology
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789x.2024/17-4/13
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Corporate Governance and Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The comparative analysis of hybrid purpose companies in the EU: Lessons and policy implications

Tea Hasić, Sabina Lacmanović, Marinko Škare
2 citations
Economics & Sociology
Corporate Governance and Law
1.11
article

The comparative analysis of hybrid purpose companies in the EU: Lessons and policy implications

Tea Hasić, Sabina Lacmanović, Marinko Škare
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study conducts a comparative analysis of hybrid purpose companies in the EU, focusing on Società Benefit in Italy, Sociedades de Beneficio e Interés Común (SBIC) in Spain, and Société à Mission in France. These companies pursue public benefits alongside profit-making, representing an innovative legal framework to address contemporary environmental, social, and economic challenges. The research objectives include systematically evaluating and comparing the legal frameworks with a focus on directors' responsibilities, transparency requirements, and control mechanisms; analysing the organisational perspective of acquiring benefit corporation status; presenting key statistics on growth trends, sectoral distribution, and performance indicators; and comparing mission reports of relevant case studies. Qualitative data analysis was implemented using publicly available secondary data and case study analysis. The results show significant similarities and specific differences between the models, especially in control mechanisms. The Italian model provides stakeholders with public enforcement mechanisms against misleading practices, while the French model relies on mission committees and independent third-party assessments. The Spanish model, introduced in 2022, is expected to develop similar control mechanisms. The growth trends and overall performance indicate that companies recognise the value of adopting this legal framework. The comparative analysis provides valuable insights for EU countries considering introducing similar hybrid-purpose models.

Economics & SociologyVol. 17(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Corporate Governance and Law
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The comparative analysis of hybrid purpose companies in the EU: Lessons and policy implications — Tea Hasić, Sabina Lacmanović, et al. · Economics & Sociology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS