Artificial Intelligence–Guided Lung Ultrasound by Nonexperts

Importance: Lung ultrasound (LUS) aids in the diagnosis of patients with dyspnea, including those with cardiogenic pulmonary edema, but requires technical proficiency for image acquisition. Previous research has demonstrated the effectiveness of artificial intelligence (AI) in guiding novice users to acquire high-quality cardiac ultrasound images, suggesting its potential for broader use in LUS. Objective: To evaluate the ability of AI to guide acquisition of diagnostic-quality LUS images by trained health care professionals (THCPs). Design, Setting, and Participants: In this multicenter diagnostic validation study conducted between July 2023 and December 2023, participants aged 21 years or older with shortness of breath recruited from 4 clinical sites underwent 2 ultrasound examinations: 1 examination by a THCP operator using Lung Guidance AI and the other by a trained LUS expert without AI. The THCPs (including medical assistants, respiratory therapists, and nurses) underwent standardized AI training for LUS acquisition before participation. Interventions: Lung Guidance AI software uses deep learning algorithms guiding LUS image acquisition and B-line annotation. Using an 8-zone LUS protocol, the AI software automatically captures images of diagnostic quality. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the proportion of THCP-acquired examinations of diagnostic quality according to a panel of 5 masked expert LUS readers, who provided remote review and ground truth validation. Results: The intention-to-treat analysis included 176 participants (81 female participants [46.0%]; mean [SD] age, 63 [14] years; mean [SD] body mass index, 31 [8]). Overall, 98.3% (95% CI, 95.1%-99.4%) of THCP-acquired studies were of diagnostic quality, with no statistically significant difference in quality compared to LUS expert-acquired studies (difference, 1.7%; 95% CI, -1.6% to 5.0%). Conclusions and Relevance: In this multicenter validation study, THCPs with AI assistance achieved LUS images meeting diagnostic standards compared with LUS experts without AI. This technology could extend access to LUS to underserved areas lacking expert personnel. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05992324.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2025-01-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/kynb-tf72
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.55

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence–Guided Lung Ultrasound by Nonexperts

Michael A. Gottlieb, Yngvil Thomas, Lori Stolz, Onyinyechi Eke et al.
1 citations
UNC Libraries
Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
1.55
article

Artificial Intelligence–Guided Lung Ultrasound by Nonexperts

Michael A. Gottlieb, Yngvil Thomas, Lori Stolz, Onyinyechi Eke, Nripesh Parajuli, Tyler J. Wellman, Luna Gargani, Evelyn Schraft, Cristiana Baloescu, Baljash Cheema, John Bailitz, Daven Patel, Jason T. Nomura, Anna Cinzia Marra, Rachel Liu, Christopher L. Moore, Eren Alkan, Ravi Agarwala, James M. O’Brien, Madeline Jankowski
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Importance: Lung ultrasound (LUS) aids in the diagnosis of patients with dyspnea, including those with cardiogenic pulmonary edema, but requires technical proficiency for image acquisition. Previous research has demonstrated the effectiveness of artificial intelligence (AI) in guiding novice users to acquire high-quality cardiac ultrasound images, suggesting its potential for broader use in LUS. Objective: To evaluate the ability of AI to guide acquisition of diagnostic-quality LUS images by trained health care professionals (THCPs). Design, Setting, and Participants: In this multicenter diagnostic validation study conducted between July 2023 and December 2023, participants aged 21 years or older with shortness of breath recruited from 4 clinical sites underwent 2 ultrasound examinations: 1 examination by a THCP operator using Lung Guidance AI and the other by a trained LUS expert without AI. The THCPs (including medical assistants, respiratory therapists, and nurses) underwent standardized AI training for LUS acquisition before participation. Interventions: Lung Guidance AI software uses deep learning algorithms guiding LUS image acquisition and B-line annotation. Using an 8-zone LUS protocol, the AI software automatically captures images of diagnostic quality. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the proportion of THCP-acquired examinations of diagnostic quality according to a panel of 5 masked expert LUS readers, who provided remote review and ground truth validation. Results: The intention-to-treat analysis included 176 participants (81 female participants [46.0%]; mean [SD] age, 63 [14] years; mean [SD] body mass index, 31 [8]). Overall, 98.3% (95% CI, 95.1%-99.4%) of THCP-acquired studies were of diagnostic quality, with no statistically significant difference in quality compared to LUS expert-acquired studies (difference, 1.7%; 95% CI, -1.6% to 5.0%). Conclusions and Relevance: In this multicenter validation study, THCPs with AI assistance achieved LUS images meeting diagnostic standards compared with LUS experts without AI. This technology could extend access to LUS to underserved areas lacking expert personnel. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05992324.

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
1.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.