Effectiveness of post-harvest treatments for Manzanilla table olives and the suitability of Hojiblanca as a substitute for mechanical harvesting

Table olives are traditionally harvested manually, however, with the increasing labor cost, there is an urgent need to develop mechanical harvesting options for this product. The current study investigated the effectiveness of post-harvest field treatments (PHFT) in reducing bruising in Manzanilla olives, alongside evaluating additional cultivars as potential substitutes in commercial table olive production. Over three seasons, Manzanilla olives were treated immediately after harvest with a diluted NaOH solution or other chemicals, while bruising incidence and sensorial impact were assessed following Spanish-style fermentation. The results demonstrated that only the 1 % NaOH field treatment among compounds studied, effectively reduced bruising across multiple seasons without altering the sensorial characteristics of Manzanilla olives, as confirmed by a triangle testing method. No significant differences in bruising levels of fermented olives were observed between day (30 °C) and night (20 °C) harvesting ( p < 0.05), suggesting that temperature variations did not significantly affect the olive quality. Hojiblanca and Picual olives were more robust during mechanical harvesting with a trunk shaker or electrical comb, however, using an overhead harvester severely damaged even the relatively resistant cultivars. Sensory evaluation through a paired-comparison test and ranking tests indicated no significant preference difference between Hojiblanca and Manzanilla ( p < 0.05), supporting Hojiblanca's potential as a substitute for Manzanilla in table olive production. This study highlights the importance of PHFT and cultivar selection in optimizing quality and consumer satisfaction in mechanically harvested table olive production. • 1 % NaOH treatment reduces bruising in mechanical harvesting of Manzanilla olives across multiple seasons. • No sensory difference between treated and untreated Manzanilla olives was detected. • Day vs. night harvesting shows no significant impact on olive bruising levels. • Hojiblanca shows less susceptibility to bruising, making it a viable alternative to Manzanilla.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Agriculture and Food Research
Published
2025-01-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2025.101676
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Edible Oils Quality and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.87

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness of post-harvest treatments for Manzanilla table olives and the suitability of Hojiblanca as a substitute for mechanical harvesting

Arnon Dag, Louise Ferguson, Ayelet Fishman, Reza Ehsani et al.
2 citations
Journal of Agriculture and Food Research
Edible Oils Quality and Analysis
1.87
article

Effectiveness of post-harvest treatments for Manzanilla table olives and the suitability of Hojiblanca as a substitute for mechanical harvesting

Arnon Dag, Louise Ferguson, Ayelet Fishman, Reza Ehsani, Paz Shemesh, Nizar Abd Elhadi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Table olives are traditionally harvested manually, however, with the increasing labor cost, there is an urgent need to develop mechanical harvesting options for this product. The current study investigated the effectiveness of post-harvest field treatments (PHFT) in reducing bruising in Manzanilla olives, alongside evaluating additional cultivars as potential substitutes in commercial table olive production. Over three seasons, Manzanilla olives were treated immediately after harvest with a diluted NaOH solution or other chemicals, while bruising incidence and sensorial impact were assessed following Spanish-style fermentation. The results demonstrated that only the 1 % NaOH field treatment among compounds studied, effectively reduced bruising across multiple seasons without altering the sensorial characteristics of Manzanilla olives, as confirmed by a triangle testing method. No significant differences in bruising levels of fermented olives were observed between day (30 °C) and night (20 °C) harvesting ( p < 0.05), suggesting that temperature variations did not significantly affect the olive quality. Hojiblanca and Picual olives were more robust during mechanical harvesting with a trunk shaker or electrical comb, however, using an overhead harvester severely damaged even the relatively resistant cultivars. Sensory evaluation through a paired-comparison test and ranking tests indicated no significant preference difference between Hojiblanca and Manzanilla ( p < 0.05), supporting Hojiblanca's potential as a substitute for Manzanilla in table olive production. This study highlights the importance of PHFT and cultivar selection in optimizing quality and consumer satisfaction in mechanically harvested table olive production. • 1 % NaOH treatment reduces bruising in mechanical harvesting of Manzanilla olives across multiple seasons. • No sensory difference between treated and untreated Manzanilla olives was detected. • Day vs. night harvesting shows no significant impact on olive bruising levels. • Hojiblanca shows less susceptibility to bruising, making it a viable alternative to Manzanilla.

Journal of Agriculture and Food ResearchVol. 19
United States - Israel Binational Agricultural Research and Development Fund
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Edible Oils Quality and Analysis
1.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.