Developing an Agricultural Futures Framework to explore the option space for agricultural change in Europe under alternative value perspectives

European agriculture must transform to confront the many challenges it faces, yet there are different sets of values that may underpin future agricultural change. However, we currently lack thorough understanding of the implications of operationalising these plural values for European land systems. In this article, we apply the IPBES Nature Futures Framework to develop a set of three land-change scenario narratives—the Agricultural Futures Framework (AFF)—representing the diverse ways that humans value agricultural land systems: Land for Food and Land for Nature, Land as Culture, and Land for Society. We operationalise the AFF scenarios in the CLUMondo land-change model and simulate how these alternative value perspectives could reshape land systems in Europe by 2050, accounting for future demands for food production, carbon sequestration, nature restoration, and nitrogen emission reduction. We find that significant land-system reconfiguration would be needed to fulfil these multiple demands under all three scenarios, ranging from 18.8% to 37.1% of all European land, with multiple scenarios showing multifunctional pathways in Eastern Romania and Bulgaria, productivist pathways in Poland and Slovakia, and marginalisation/rewilding pathways in Central France and Northern Spain. However, the magnitude and spatial locations of change differ substantially across the prioritised value perspectives, suggesting that these may have large implications for future agricultural development. The AFF framework and our findings are useful for identifying opportunities to reconcile the divisions in values perspectives, and to prioritise interventions for agri-food transformations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability Science
Published
2025-01-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-024-01612-4
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.32

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developing an Agricultural Futures Framework to explore the option space for agricultural change in Europe under alternative value perspectives

Peter H. Verburg, Matthias Bürgi, Félix Herzog, Tim G. Williams et al.
3 citations
Sustainability Science
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
3.32
article

Developing an Agricultural Futures Framework to explore the option space for agricultural change in Europe under alternative value perspectives

Peter H. Verburg, Matthias Bürgi, Félix Herzog, Tim G. Williams, Christian Levers, Vasco Diogo, Niels Debonne
article en
3 citations

Abstract

European agriculture must transform to confront the many challenges it faces, yet there are different sets of values that may underpin future agricultural change. However, we currently lack thorough understanding of the implications of operationalising these plural values for European land systems. In this article, we apply the IPBES Nature Futures Framework to develop a set of three land-change scenario narratives—the Agricultural Futures Framework (AFF)—representing the diverse ways that humans value agricultural land systems: Land for Food and Land for Nature, Land as Culture, and Land for Society. We operationalise the AFF scenarios in the CLUMondo land-change model and simulate how these alternative value perspectives could reshape land systems in Europe by 2050, accounting for future demands for food production, carbon sequestration, nature restoration, and nitrogen emission reduction. We find that significant land-system reconfiguration would be needed to fulfil these multiple demands under all three scenarios, ranging from 18.8% to 37.1% of all European land, with multiple scenarios showing multifunctional pathways in Eastern Romania and Bulgaria, productivist pathways in Poland and Slovakia, and marginalisation/rewilding pathways in Central France and Northern Spain. However, the magnitude and spatial locations of change differ substantially across the prioritised value perspectives, suggesting that these may have large implications for future agricultural development. The AFF framework and our findings are useful for identifying opportunities to reconcile the divisions in values perspectives, and to prioritise interventions for agri-food transformations.

Sustainability Science
University of Bern (CH), Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (CH), Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut (DE), Agroscope (CH), Federal Office for Agriculture (CH), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
3.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.