Comparative assessment of element types for evaluating local elastic buckling behavior of rectangular hollow sections using finite element analysis

This study systematically evaluates the performance of conventional shell elements in Abaqus for predicting the local elastic buckling behavior of rectangular hollow sections (RHSs) under various loading conditions, including axial compression, major axis bending, and minor axis bending. Theoretical local buckling coefficients were first derived based on the cross-sectional dimensions of RHSs and used to calculate the critical local buckling stress for each loading scenario. Finite element analyses (FEA) were then performed using different shell element types, including four-node and eight-node elements, to assess their accuracy and computational efficiency. The results indicate that four-node shell elements (S4, S4R) offer a favorable balance of accuracy and significantly reduced computational time, making them the most efficient option. In contrast, eight-node elements (S8R, S8R5) provide marginally higher accuracy but require substantially longer computation times and have limited applicability. This study underscores the importance of selecting appropriate elements to achieve a balance between accuracy and efficiency, providing valuable guidance for engineers in structural design. By optimizing element selection for modeling local elastic buckling in RHSs, the research improves computational efficiency and supports the development of more reliable, cost-effective designs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Innovative Engineering and Natural Science
Published
2024-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61112/jiens.1555378
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative assessment of element types for evaluating local elastic buckling behavior of rectangular hollow sections using finite element analysis

Kazım Ercan, Osman Özenç, Mehmet Akif Dundar
1 citations
Journal of Innovative Engineering and Natural Science
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
0.26
article

Comparative assessment of element types for evaluating local elastic buckling behavior of rectangular hollow sections using finite element analysis

Kazım Ercan, Osman Özenç, Mehmet Akif Dundar
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study systematically evaluates the performance of conventional shell elements in Abaqus for predicting the local elastic buckling behavior of rectangular hollow sections (RHSs) under various loading conditions, including axial compression, major axis bending, and minor axis bending. Theoretical local buckling coefficients were first derived based on the cross-sectional dimensions of RHSs and used to calculate the critical local buckling stress for each loading scenario. Finite element analyses (FEA) were then performed using different shell element types, including four-node and eight-node elements, to assess their accuracy and computational efficiency. The results indicate that four-node shell elements (S4, S4R) offer a favorable balance of accuracy and significantly reduced computational time, making them the most efficient option. In contrast, eight-node elements (S8R, S8R5) provide marginally higher accuracy but require substantially longer computation times and have limited applicability. This study underscores the importance of selecting appropriate elements to achieve a balance between accuracy and efficiency, providing valuable guidance for engineers in structural design. By optimizing element selection for modeling local elastic buckling in RHSs, the research improves computational efficiency and supports the development of more reliable, cost-effective designs.

Journal of Innovative Engineering and Natural ScienceVol. 5(1)
Yozgat Bozok Üniversitesi (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
0.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.