Complex quantitative assessment of social research survey results

Research on social problems of various natures is gaining more and more attention. Their primary tool is surveying. Various computer programs have been developed to process and analyse the results. On the other hand, the characteristics they calculate may be used only for specific purposes. Their main drawback is that they must provide a generalized picture of the problem in question, i.e., the whole remains unclear. Without this, analogous objects cannot be compared with each other. The proposed methodology, which has the acronym QEQS (Quantitative Evaluation of Quantitative Sizes), provides such opportunities. Its main advantages are that it is possible to combine an unlimited number of answers to questions into a single summarizing size index; any range of scales may be used for assessment; consider the importance of different options for answering the questions; determines not only the aggregated value of the answers to the individual queries but also the index that aggregates them.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2024/17-4/16
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Economic and Business Development Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Complex quantitative assessment of social research survey results

Romualdas Ginevičius
2 citations
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES
Economic and Business Development Strategies
2.26
article

Complex quantitative assessment of social research survey results

Romualdas Ginevičius
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Research on social problems of various natures is gaining more and more attention. Their primary tool is surveying. Various computer programs have been developed to process and analyse the results. On the other hand, the characteristics they calculate may be used only for specific purposes. Their main drawback is that they must provide a generalized picture of the problem in question, i.e., the whole remains unclear. Without this, analogous objects cannot be compared with each other. The proposed methodology, which has the acronym QEQS (Quantitative Evaluation of Quantitative Sizes), provides such opportunities. Its main advantages are that it is possible to combine an unlimited number of answers to questions into a single summarizing size index; any range of scales may be used for assessment; consider the importance of different options for answering the questions; determines not only the aggregated value of the answers to the individual queries but also the index that aggregates them.

JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIESVol. 17(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Economic and Business Development Strategies
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Complex quantitative assessment of social research survey results — Romualdas Ginevičius · JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS