Dynamic Failure Mechanism and Fractal Features of Fractured Rocks Under Quasi-Triaxial Static Pressures and Repeated Impact Loading

Mastering the dynamic mechanical behaviors of pre-stressed fractured rocks under repeated impact loads is crucial for safety management in rock engineering. To achieve this, repeated impact loading experiments were performed on produced fractured samples exposed to varying pre-applied axial and confining pressures using a split Hopkinson pressure bar test system in combination with a nuclear magnetic resonance imaging system, and the dynamic failure mechanism and fractal features were investigated. The results indicate that the dynamic stress–strain curves exemplify typical class II curves, and the strain rebound progressively diminishes with growing impact times. The impact times, axial pressure, and confining pressure all significantly affect the dynamic peak strength, average dynamic strength, dynamic deformation modulus, average dynamic deformation modulus, maximum strain, and impact resistance performance. Moreover, under low confining pressures, numerous shear cracks and tensile cracks develop, which are interconnected and converge to form large-scale macroscopic fracture surfaces. In contrast, specimens under a high confining pressure primarily experience tensile failure, accompanied by localized small-scale shear failure. Under low axial pressure, some shear cracks and tensile cracks emerge, while at high axial pressure, anti-wing cracks and secondary coplanar cracks occur, characterized predominantly by shear failure. In addition, as the confining pressure grows from 8 to 20 MPa, the fractal dimensions are 2.44, 2.32, 2.23, and 2.12, respectively. When the axial pressures are 8, 14, and 20 MPa, the fractal dimensions are 2.44, 2.46, and 2.52, respectively. Overall, the degree of fragmentation of the sample decreases with growing confining pressure and grows with rising axial pressure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fractal and Fractional
Published
2025-01-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract9020071
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Geotechnical and Geomechanical Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.91

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamic Failure Mechanism and Fractal Features of Fractured Rocks Under Quasi-Triaxial Static Pressures and Repeated Impact Loading

Xinghui Wu, Zhihong Dong, Meifeng Cai, Jie Zhang et al.
8 citations
Fractal and Fractional
Geotechnical and Geomechanical Engineering
6.91
article

Dynamic Failure Mechanism and Fractal Features of Fractured Rocks Under Quasi-Triaxial Static Pressures and Repeated Impact Loading

Xinghui Wu, Zhihong Dong, Meifeng Cai, Jie Zhang, Yan Liu, Shengjun Miao, Peng Li
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Mastering the dynamic mechanical behaviors of pre-stressed fractured rocks under repeated impact loads is crucial for safety management in rock engineering. To achieve this, repeated impact loading experiments were performed on produced fractured samples exposed to varying pre-applied axial and confining pressures using a split Hopkinson pressure bar test system in combination with a nuclear magnetic resonance imaging system, and the dynamic failure mechanism and fractal features were investigated. The results indicate that the dynamic stress–strain curves exemplify typical class II curves, and the strain rebound progressively diminishes with growing impact times. The impact times, axial pressure, and confining pressure all significantly affect the dynamic peak strength, average dynamic strength, dynamic deformation modulus, average dynamic deformation modulus, maximum strain, and impact resistance performance. Moreover, under low confining pressures, numerous shear cracks and tensile cracks develop, which are interconnected and converge to form large-scale macroscopic fracture surfaces. In contrast, specimens under a high confining pressure primarily experience tensile failure, accompanied by localized small-scale shear failure. Under low axial pressure, some shear cracks and tensile cracks emerge, while at high axial pressure, anti-wing cracks and secondary coplanar cracks occur, characterized predominantly by shear failure. In addition, as the confining pressure grows from 8 to 20 MPa, the fractal dimensions are 2.44, 2.32, 2.23, and 2.12, respectively. When the axial pressures are 8, 14, and 20 MPa, the fractal dimensions are 2.44, 2.46, and 2.52, respectively. Overall, the degree of fragmentation of the sample decreases with growing confining pressure and grows with rising axial pressure.

Fractal and FractionalVol. 9(2)
China University of Mining and Technology (CN), China Energy Engineering Corporation (China) (CN), Zaozhuang University (CN), University of Science and Technology Beijing (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, China University of Mining and Technology, University of Science and Technology Beijing, State Key Laboratory of Coal Resources and Safe Mining, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Geotechnical and Geomechanical Engineering
6.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.