DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF NEUTROPHIL TO LYMPHOCYTE RATIO IN ACUTE APPENDICITIS WITH HISTOPATHOLOGY AS GOLD STANDARD

Acute appendicitis is one of the most common surgical emergencies worldwide, requiring prompt and accurate diagnosis to prevent complications. In resource-constrained settings like Pakistan, reliance on advanced imaging modalities is often impractical. The Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) has emerged as a cost-effective and accessible biomarker for diagnosing acute appendicitis. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of NLR in identifying acute appendicitis using histopathology as the gold standard. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 124 patients clinically suspected of having acute appendicitis at a tertiary care hospital. NLR values were calculated from routine complete blood counts, and histopathological examination was used to confirm the diagnosis. Diagnostic performance metrics, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and overall accuracy, were calculated. Stratified analyses were performed based on age, gender, and Modified Alvarado Scores. Results: The NLR cutoff of ≥3.5 demonstrated a sensitivity of 88.6%, specificity of 86.6%, PPV of 92.1%, NPV of 81.2%, and overall diagnostic accuracy of 87.9%. Diagnostic accuracy was higher in patients aged 46–70 years (92.8%) compared to those aged 18–45 years (83.8%). Male patients exhibited slightly better diagnostic accuracy (90.4%) than females (85.2%). Integration of NLR with the Modified Alvarado Score improved diagnostic precision, with accuracy reaching 88.2% in patients with scores >8.Conclusion: NLR is a reliable, cost-effective biomarker for diagnosing acute appendicitis, particularly in resource-limited settings. Its integration with clinical scoring systems can enhance diagnostic accuracy, reduce unnecessary appendectomies, and improve patient outcomes. Further research is needed to standardize NLR cutoff values and validate its application in broader clinical settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v2024i1.1349
Primary Topic
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF NEUTROPHIL TO LYMPHOCYTE RATIO IN ACUTE APPENDICITIS WITH HISTOPATHOLOGY AS GOLD STANDARD

Bilqees Fatima, Rabbi Zia, Zuhair Bani Ismail, Muhammad Zubaır et al.
Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
article

DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF NEUTROPHIL TO LYMPHOCYTE RATIO IN ACUTE APPENDICITIS WITH HISTOPATHOLOGY AS GOLD STANDARD

Bilqees Fatima, Rabbi Zia, Zuhair Bani Ismail, Muhammad Zubaır, Ali Z, Hamama Tul Bushra, NA KHAN, IA RAJPUT
article en

Abstract

Acute appendicitis is one of the most common surgical emergencies worldwide, requiring prompt and accurate diagnosis to prevent complications. In resource-constrained settings like Pakistan, reliance on advanced imaging modalities is often impractical. The Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) has emerged as a cost-effective and accessible biomarker for diagnosing acute appendicitis. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of NLR in identifying acute appendicitis using histopathology as the gold standard. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 124 patients clinically suspected of having acute appendicitis at a tertiary care hospital. NLR values were calculated from routine complete blood counts, and histopathological examination was used to confirm the diagnosis. Diagnostic performance metrics, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and overall accuracy, were calculated. Stratified analyses were performed based on age, gender, and Modified Alvarado Scores. Results: The NLR cutoff of ≥3.5 demonstrated a sensitivity of 88.6%, specificity of 86.6%, PPV of 92.1%, NPV of 81.2%, and overall diagnostic accuracy of 87.9%. Diagnostic accuracy was higher in patients aged 46–70 years (92.8%) compared to those aged 18–45 years (83.8%). Male patients exhibited slightly better diagnostic accuracy (90.4%) than females (85.2%). Integration of NLR with the Modified Alvarado Score improved diagnostic precision, with accuracy reaching 88.2% in patients with scores >8.Conclusion: NLR is a reliable, cost-effective biomarker for diagnosing acute appendicitis, particularly in resource-limited settings. Its integration with clinical scoring systems can enhance diagnostic accuracy, reduce unnecessary appendectomies, and improve patient outcomes. Further research is needed to standardize NLR cutoff values and validate its application in broader clinical settings.

Biological and Clinical Sciences Research JournalVol. 2024(1)
Dow University of Health Sciences (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.