Estimation of Pressure Pain in the Lower Limbs Using Electrodermal Activity, Tissue Oxygen Saturation, and Heart Rate Variability

Quantification of pain or discomfort induced by pressure is essential for understanding human responses to physical stimuli and improving user interfaces. Pain research has been conducted to investigate physiological signals associated with discomfort and pain perception. This study analyzed changes in electrodermal activity (EDA), tissue oxygen saturation (StO<sub>2</sub>), heart rate variability (HRV), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) under pressures of 10, 20, and 30 kPa applied for 3 min to the thigh, knee, and calf in a seated position. Twenty participants were tested, and relationships between biosignals, pressure intensity, and pain levels were evaluated using Friedman tests and post-hoc analyses. Multiple linear regression models were used to predict VAS and pressure, and five machine learning models (SVM, Logistic Regression, Random Forest, MLP, KNN) were applied to classify pain levels (no pain: VAS 0, low: VAS 1-3, moderate: VAS 4-6, high: VAS 7-10) and pressure intensity. The results showed that higher pressure intensity and pain levels affected sympathetic nervous system responses and tissue oxygen saturation. Most EDA features and StO<sub>2</sub> significantly changed according to pressure intensity and pain levels, while NN interval and HF among HRV features showed significant differences based on pressure intensity or pain level. Regression analysis combining biosignal features achieved a maximum R<sup>2</sup> of 0.668 in predicting VAS and pressure intensity. The four-level classification model reached an accuracy of 88.2% for pain levels and 81.3% for pressure intensity. These results demonstrated the potential of EDA, StO<sub>2</sub>, HRV signals, and combinations of biosignal features for pain quantification and prediction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sensors
Published
2025-01-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/s25030680
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.16

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimation of Pressure Pain in the Lower Limbs Using Electrodermal Activity, Tissue Oxygen Saturation, and Heart Rate Variability

C. I. Park, Sung-Hyuk Song, Youngho Kim, Seung‐Hee Lee et al.
3 citations
Sensors
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
4.16
article

Estimation of Pressure Pain in the Lower Limbs Using Electrodermal Activity, Tissue Oxygen Saturation, and Heart Rate Variability

C. I. Park, Sung-Hyuk Song, Youngho Kim, Seung‐Hee Lee, Sang-Woo Pyo
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Quantification of pain or discomfort induced by pressure is essential for understanding human responses to physical stimuli and improving user interfaces. Pain research has been conducted to investigate physiological signals associated with discomfort and pain perception. This study analyzed changes in electrodermal activity (EDA), tissue oxygen saturation (StO<sub>2</sub>), heart rate variability (HRV), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) under pressures of 10, 20, and 30 kPa applied for 3 min to the thigh, knee, and calf in a seated position. Twenty participants were tested, and relationships between biosignals, pressure intensity, and pain levels were evaluated using Friedman tests and post-hoc analyses. Multiple linear regression models were used to predict VAS and pressure, and five machine learning models (SVM, Logistic Regression, Random Forest, MLP, KNN) were applied to classify pain levels (no pain: VAS 0, low: VAS 1-3, moderate: VAS 4-6, high: VAS 7-10) and pressure intensity. The results showed that higher pressure intensity and pain levels affected sympathetic nervous system responses and tissue oxygen saturation. Most EDA features and StO<sub>2</sub> significantly changed according to pressure intensity and pain levels, while NN interval and HF among HRV features showed significant differences based on pressure intensity or pain level. Regression analysis combining biosignal features achieved a maximum R<sup>2</sup> of 0.668 in predicting VAS and pressure intensity. The four-level classification model reached an accuracy of 88.2% for pain levels and 81.3% for pressure intensity. These results demonstrated the potential of EDA, StO<sub>2</sub>, HRV signals, and combinations of biosignal features for pain quantification and prediction.

SensorsVol. 25(3)
Yonsei University (KR), Korea Institute of Machinery & Materials (KR)
National Research Foundation, Yonsei University, Korea Institute of Machinery and Materials, National Research Foundation of Korea, Ministry of Education, India
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
4.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.