Ethical considerations for the use of ecological momentary assessment in non-suicidal self-injury research
Research examining non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) in daily life has grown substantially; thus, it is essential in conducting ecological momentary assessment (EMA) research with individuals who self-injure to follow important ethical guidelines. Given the challenges faced by researchers in monitoring, assessing, and responding to risk among those who self-injure, further guidance and research is warranted in informing best-practices for conducting EMA research examining NSSI. We suggest ethics-based approaches to professional competence, responding to and monitoring risk, and ensuring inclusive and representative approaches to NSSI research in daily life. Related empirical and practical issues in need of further investigation are discussed.
Authors
- Sarah E. Victor (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7944-7299)
- Glenn Kiekens (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8747-3385)
- Brooke A. Ammerman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0367-6589)
- Elizabeth C. Hoelscher
Institutions
- Texas Tech University (US)
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Tilburg University (NL)
- Contextual Change (United States) (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Ethics & Behavior
- Published
- 2025-01-23
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2025.2456714
- Citations
- 4
- Primary Topic
- Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 9.23
Funders
- American Foundation for Suicide Prevention
- Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
- National Institute of Mental Health