Modern approaches to assessing motor development in infants and young children in clinical practice

Early detection of motor impairments poses a significant diagnostic challenge. This article examines methods that go beyond classical neurological examinations and are widely applied in both international and domestic practices for assessing motor development in infants and young children. Diagnostic methods for evaluating motor development or predicting the risk of motor impairments can be categorized as follows: anamnestic methods (used to identify children at risk of motor skills disorders); milestone-based assessments (compare motor development to established norms); standardized observations (focus on the quality of movements and motor patterns; e.g., standardized neurological examinations adapted for infants and young children); screening tools (include standardized and semi-standardized instruments); developmental tests (assess motor and broader developmental domains). Routine neurological examinations alone are insufficient for evidence-based assessments of motor development in high-risk infants or for evaluating intervention outcomes. While neurological scales are versatile, cultural factors can influence motor development stages. Although this influence is less significant than in other developmental domains, assessment tools must be adapted to national norms to maintain validity. Assessment tools may either have a narrow focus (evaluating motor functions exclusively) or take a comprehensive approach (assessing motor functions alongside other developmental domains). The choice of a tool depends on the child’s age and the clinician’s objectives, such as identifying children at risk, predicting developmental outcomes, or evaluating the effectiveness of rehabilitation or early intervention programs. A critical limitation is the availability of tools and whether they have been adapted for domestic use. This article outlines the age ranges, diagnostic parameters, and practical applications of 21 evidence-based diagnostic tools. It provides a classification of these tools and discusses their applications, particularly in multidisciplinary and multi-level diagnostic approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Russian Family Doctor
Published
2024-12-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17816/rfd636111
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Infant Development and Preterm Care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.33
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modern approaches to assessing motor development in infants and young children in clinical practice

Н В Андрущенко, Alexander B. Palchik, Marina V. Osipova
3 citations
Russian Family Doctor
Infant Development and Preterm Care
3.33
article

Modern approaches to assessing motor development in infants and young children in clinical practice

Н В Андрущенко, Alexander B. Palchik, Marina V. Osipova
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Early detection of motor impairments poses a significant diagnostic challenge. This article examines methods that go beyond classical neurological examinations and are widely applied in both international and domestic practices for assessing motor development in infants and young children. Diagnostic methods for evaluating motor development or predicting the risk of motor impairments can be categorized as follows: anamnestic methods (used to identify children at risk of motor skills disorders); milestone-based assessments (compare motor development to established norms); standardized observations (focus on the quality of movements and motor patterns; e.g., standardized neurological examinations adapted for infants and young children); screening tools (include standardized and semi-standardized instruments); developmental tests (assess motor and broader developmental domains). Routine neurological examinations alone are insufficient for evidence-based assessments of motor development in high-risk infants or for evaluating intervention outcomes. While neurological scales are versatile, cultural factors can influence motor development stages. Although this influence is less significant than in other developmental domains, assessment tools must be adapted to national norms to maintain validity. Assessment tools may either have a narrow focus (evaluating motor functions exclusively) or take a comprehensive approach (assessing motor functions alongside other developmental domains). The choice of a tool depends on the child’s age and the clinician’s objectives, such as identifying children at risk, predicting developmental outcomes, or evaluating the effectiveness of rehabilitation or early intervention programs. A critical limitation is the availability of tools and whether they have been adapted for domestic use. This article outlines the age ranges, diagnostic parameters, and practical applications of 21 evidence-based diagnostic tools. It provides a classification of these tools and discusses their applications, particularly in multidisciplinary and multi-level diagnostic approaches.

Russian Family DoctorVol. 28(4)
St Petersburg University (RU), North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov (RU), Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Infant Development and Preterm Care
3.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.