Comparison and Analysis of LSTM-Capsule Networks and 3DConv-LSTM Autoencoder in Ambient Anomaly Detection

Considering the population density in cities, manual detection of abnormal situations in the ambient by humans is an economically expensive and time-consuming application. In recent years, a number of approaches have been proposed for anomaly detection. Compared to other approaches, deep learning models have achieved great accuracy in detecting a wide variety of abnormal events. The unsupervised models outperform other deep learning models in anomaly detection. Therefore, in this study, two unsupervised deep learning models (LSTM-Capsule Networks and 3DConv-LSTMAutoencoder) are compared and analyzed with each other in the feature extraction stage. Performance is evaluated with accuracy and loss metrics. The Python programming language is used. And this work is tested with ambient anomaly datasets such as CUHK Avenue, UCSD Ped1, and UCSD Ped2. The experimental results showed that LSTM-Capsule Networks outperform the 3DConv-LSTM Autoencoder and have high potential in ambient anomaly detection among the existing methods we examined.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/eleco64362.2024.10847263
Primary Topic
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison and Analysis of LSTM-Capsule Networks and 3DConv-LSTM Autoencoder in Ambient Anomaly Detection

Nihan Kahraman, Barış Kopuz
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
article

Comparison and Analysis of LSTM-Capsule Networks and 3DConv-LSTM Autoencoder in Ambient Anomaly Detection

Nihan Kahraman, Barış Kopuz
article en

Abstract

Considering the population density in cities, manual detection of abnormal situations in the ambient by humans is an economically expensive and time-consuming application. In recent years, a number of approaches have been proposed for anomaly detection. Compared to other approaches, deep learning models have achieved great accuracy in detecting a wide variety of abnormal events. The unsupervised models outperform other deep learning models in anomaly detection. Therefore, in this study, two unsupervised deep learning models (LSTM-Capsule Networks and 3DConv-LSTMAutoencoder) are compared and analyzed with each other in the feature extraction stage. Performance is evaluated with accuracy and loss metrics. The Python programming language is used. And this work is tested with ambient anomaly datasets such as CUHK Avenue, UCSD Ped1, and UCSD Ped2. The experimental results showed that LSTM-Capsule Networks outperform the 3DConv-LSTM Autoencoder and have high potential in ambient anomaly detection among the existing methods we examined.

Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison and Analysis of LSTM-Capsule Networks and 3DConv-LSTM Autoencoder in Ambient Anomaly Detection — Nihan Kahraman, Barış Kopuz · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS